.NDI.MjIzMTY: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
him Guilty of it for so righteous men may | him Guilty of it for so righteous men may | ||
be condemned unjustly. In case of witchcraft | be condemned unjustly. In case of witchcraft | ||
we know that the | we know that the Devil is the immediate agent | ||
in the | in the mischief done, the Consent or Compact of | ||
the witch is the thing to be demonstrated. | the witch is the thing to be demonstrated. | ||
Among many Arguments to evince this that | Among many Arguments to evince this that |
Revision as of 03:46, 1 July 2017
an Evidence Supposed to go in the Testimony which is throwly to be Weighed, & if it does not infallibly prove the Crime against the person accused, it ought not to determine him Guilty of it for so righteous men may be condemned unjustly. In case of witchcraft we know that the Devil is the immediate agent in the mischief done, the Consent or Compact of the witch is the thing to be demonstrated. Among many Arguments to evince this that which is most under present debate, is that which refers to something vulgarly called _Spec- tre evidence_ and a certain sort of ordeal or tryall by the Sight and Touch. The princi- pal plea to justify the convictive evidence of those is fetched from the consideration of the wis- dome and Justice of God in Governing the work which they suppose would fail if such things were permitted to befall an inocent person. but it is certain that too resolute conclusi- ons drawn from Hence, are bold usurpations upon spotless Soveraignty, & tho somethings if suffered to be common would subvert this Government & disband yea ruine Humane Society; yet God doth sometimes suffer such things