.NDI.MjIzMTY: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
him Guilty of it for so righteous men may
him Guilty of it for so righteous men may
be condemned unjustly. In case of witchcraft
be condemned unjustly. In case of witchcraft
we know that the Divel is the imediate agent
we know that the Devil is the immediate agent
in the mischeif done, the Consent or Compact of
in the mischief done, the Consent or Compact of
the witch is the thing to be demonstrated.
the witch is the thing to be demonstrated.
Among many Arguments to evince this that
Among many Arguments to evince this that

Revision as of 03:46, 1 July 2017

an Evidence Supposed to go in the Testimony which is throwly to be Weighed, & if it does not infallibly prove the Crime against the person accused, it ought not to determine him Guilty of it for so righteous men may be condemned unjustly. In case of witchcraft we know that the Devil is the immediate agent in the mischief done, the Consent or Compact of the witch is the thing to be demonstrated. Among many Arguments to evince this that which is most under present debate, is that which refers to something vulgarly called _Spec- tre evidence_ and a certain sort of ordeal or tryall by the Sight and Touch. The princi- pal plea to justify the convictive evidence of those is fetched from the consideration of the wis- dome and Justice of God in Governing the work which they suppose would fail if such things were permitted to befall an inocent person. but it is certain that too resolute conclusi- ons drawn from Hence, are bold usurpations upon spotless Soveraignty, & tho somethings if suffered to be common would subvert this Government & disband yea ruine Humane Society; yet God doth sometimes suffer such things