.MTM5Ng.MTIwNzQw: Difference between revisions
KyroBrandon (talk | contribs) (Created page with "not long thereafter, the uncleardiscovered upon the personal ugliness of Jiotto, so curiously of to the sovereignty of art; and if tradition is correct in recognizing a...") |
KyroBrandon (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
was common knowledge, without insinuating | was common knowledge, without insinuating | ||
doubt on the authenticity of an acquaintanceship on the | doubt on the authenticity of an acquaintanceship on the | ||
part of [[Fitrarel?]]. The doubts begin with the | part of [[Fitrarel?]]. The doubts begin with the | ||
chronological inconsistency of the meeting: if [[unclear]] | |||
contained nothing but pure gold, there would be | |||
[[vain?]] only to hesitate between [[Pisa?]] (the [[Pisa?]] | |||
where Petrarch is thought to have seen Dante), | |||
Romagna and but of all Avignon; To-day we | |||
can only turn the difficult question | |||
to the specialists in the biography of who do not | |||
appear to have posted it. Another, but this time | |||
Revision as of 19:18, 14 October 2021
not long thereafter, the uncleardiscovered upon the personal ugliness of Jiotto, so curiously of to the sovereignty of art; and if tradition is correct in recognizing a self portrait in a certain profile of the 'unclear agti unclear, he was not outstanding for unclear. This served only to bring out to what extent the anecdote was common knowledge, without insinuating doubt on the authenticity of an acquaintanceship on the part of Fitrarel?. The doubts begin with the chronological inconsistency of the meeting: if unclear contained nothing but pure gold, there would be vain? only to hesitate between Pisa? (the Pisa? where Petrarch is thought to have seen Dante), Romagna and but of all Avignon; To-day we can only turn the difficult question to the specialists in the biography of who do not appear to have posted it. Another, but this time