.MTM5Nw.MTIwNzY3: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "18 the vasopressor and a person for the dilator. In that way he was able to explain whatever happened. I was quite inexperienced in the world of research at that time and I...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
18
18


the vasopressor and a person for the dilator.  In that way
the vasopressor and a pressor for the dilator.  In that way
he was able to explain whatever happened.  I was quite
he was able to explain whatever happened.  I was quite
inexperienced in the world of research at that time and I was
inexperienced in the world of research at that time and I was
vastly impressed by this vascular microcam conjured up
vastly impressed by this vascular microcosm conjured up
by the inventors wand.  The only thing was I couldn't decide
by the inventor's wand.  The only thing was, I couldn't decide
whether I should believe it or not.  Finally I asked somebody
whether I should believe it or not.  Finally I asked somebody
from P & S whether all of this had been confirmed in some
from P & S whether all of this had been confirmed in some
Line 12: Line 12:
it would take someone else half a lifetime to repeat it and
it would take someone else half a lifetime to repeat it and
nobody is sufficiently interested to give the time to it."  I
nobody is sufficiently interested to give the time to it."  I
gathered that most groups took a dive blow of the whole story, although
gathered that most groups took a dim view of the whole story, although
the journals published the papers, probably because they
the journals published the paper, probably because they
couldn't deny it any more than they could confirm it.  So far as
couldn't deny it any more than they could confirm it.  So far as
I know, the whole theory was lost sight of and to this day I don't
I know, the whole theory was lost sight of and to this day I don't
know whether the author was an enthusiast, a prophet or an
know whether the author was an enthusiast, a prophet or an
imposter.  But that was a picturesque phenomenon of that
impostor.  But that was a picturesque phenomenon of that
period a curious exception in a history which, not so long before
period a curious exception in a history which, not so long before,
had showed the discovery and [[??]] thinkers and the conquests, or at least could of
had shown the discovery and isolation of insulin and the conquest, or at least control of
pernicious anemia
pernicious anemia."
"You don't think it's still that way, Doctor?  That is, that
  "You don't think it's still that way, Doctor?  That is, that
creative discovery is going on all right, but that everything is
creative discovery is going on all right, but that everything is
bigger so the flaws in the system are more conspicuous?"
bigger so the flaws in the system are more conspicuous?"
"I wish I could think so, Inspector, but the evidence
  "I wish I could think so, Inspector, but the evidence
seems to me pretty convincing that the same elements which
seems to me pretty convincing that the same elements which
are disrupting our schools and universities, our religion, our
are disrupting our schools and universities, our religion, our
Line 31: Line 31:
medicine.  Of course there were flaws before, no question
medicine.  Of course there were flaws before, no question
about that, but they were the ordinary human flaws
about that, but they were the ordinary human flaws
and, as such, were understandable, [??]
and, as such, were understandable, even predictable.
Good doctors and bad ones, wise ones and stupid ones
Good doctors and bad ones, wise ones and stupid ones
those who were ambitious for the almighty [??] and
those who were ambitious for the almighty dollar and

Latest revision as of 04:14, 4 August 2021

18

the vasopressor and a pressor for the dilator. In that way he was able to explain whatever happened. I was quite inexperienced in the world of research at that time and I was vastly impressed by this vascular microcosm conjured up by the inventor's wand. The only thing was, I couldn't decide whether I should believe it or not. Finally I asked somebody from P & S whether all of this had been confirmed in some other laboratory, to which he responded after what I took to be a certain hesitation, "He's carried it all so far that it would take someone else half a lifetime to repeat it and nobody is sufficiently interested to give the time to it." I gathered that most groups took a dim view of the whole story, although the journals published the paper, probably because they couldn't deny it any more than they could confirm it. So far as I know, the whole theory was lost sight of and to this day I don't know whether the author was an enthusiast, a prophet or an impostor. But that was a picturesque phenomenon of that period a curious exception in a history which, not so long before, had shown the discovery and isolation of insulin and the conquest, or at least control of pernicious anemia."

  "You don't think it's still that way, Doctor?  That is, that

creative discovery is going on all right, but that everything is bigger so the flaws in the system are more conspicuous?"

  "I wish I could think so, Inspector, but the evidence

seems to me pretty convincing that the same elements which are disrupting our schools and universities, our religion, our character and standards of morality - have penetrated that most sensitive of fields, namely, the profession of medicine. Of course there were flaws before, no question about that, but they were the ordinary human flaws and, as such, were understandable, even predictable. Good doctors and bad ones, wise ones and stupid ones those who were ambitious for the almighty dollar and