.MTAxNg.NjcyODU: Difference between revisions
imported>Emmaw7 No edit summary |
imported>Emmaw7 No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
And burnt the day before , this fact was chardged upon [[Som?]] of these [[crossed out]] Indians of wamesit, but they were innocent as was after ward [[charged?]], for some skulking indians of the enimy, that formerly lived about Groton [[unclear]] [[unclear]][[unclear]] wherof was named Nathaniel. hee & his party [[unclear]] this and [[unclear]] mischeefe afterward m [[unclear]] [[unclear]] houses at Chelmsford. And one principle design of the enimy was to [[unclear]] a differente, [[unclear]] the English & praying indians living at wamesit. that so [[unclear]] [[unclear]] either bee [[returned?]] by the [[English?]] or [[negotiated]] to [[unclear]] to the enimy. this Nathaniel was afterward taken at Cochecho : and executed at Boston who [[confesed?]] the [[some?]] Moreover [[Lieutenant]] [[Richardson?]] , whose hay was Burnt was a person, welbeloved of [[these?]] indians at wamesit & their great friend, who did not [[unclear]] as he told [[unclear]], that any of the wamesit men had burnt his hay. But others were of a contrary mind willing to [[give?]] credit to any report [[unclear]] the praying indians & accordingly by [[unclear]] to the [[Genll?]] court [[unclear]] an order for a troope of [[unclear]] (as I said Before) to [[marche?]] up to wamesit & bring downe those indians of wamesit to Boston: | And burnt the day before , this fact was chardged upon [[Som?]] of these [[crossed out]] Indians of wamesit, but they were innocent as was after ward [[charged?]], for some skulking indians of the enimy, that formerly lived about Groton [[unclear]] [[unclear]][[unclear]] wherof was named Nathaniel. hee & his party [[unclear]] this and [[unclear]] mischeefe afterward m [[unclear]] [[unclear]] houses at Chelmsford. And one principle design of the enimy was to [[unclear]] a differente, [[unclear]] the English & praying indians living at wamesit. that so [[unclear]] [[unclear]] either bee [[returned?]] by the [[English?]] or [[negotiated]] to [[unclear]] to the enimy. this Nathaniel was afterward taken at Cochecho : and executed at Boston who [[confesed?]] the [[some?]] Moreover [[Lieutenant]] [[Richardson?]] , whose hay was Burnt was a person, welbeloved of [[these?]] indians at wamesit & their great friend, who did not [[unclear]] as he told [[unclear]], that any of the wamesit men had burnt his hay. But others were of a contrary mind willing to [[give?]] credit to any report [[unclear]] the praying indians & accordingly by [[unclear]] to the [[Genll?]] court [[unclear]] an order for a troope of [[unclear]] (as I said Before) to [[marche?]] up to wamesit & bring downe those indians of wamesit to Boston: this matter [[might?]] have been accomplished as wel by 2 men as 40 [[croopers?]] for the indians upon the [[unclear]] [[message?]] from the court, would readily have obeyed. upon the 20th of october mr Joseph Cooke of cambridge was sent downs (by Cornel oakey & comanded the troope) onto the court to informe, & the wamesit Indians were upon the way comin downe according to order, And [[unclear]] [[unclear]] be [[unclear]] on the morrow, [[unclear]] has aquainted the court [[unclear]] [[they?]] were in number about 145 men women and children, whereof about 33 were men that they were all unarmed. that many of them were naked and [[unclear]] of them [[decripit?]] [[with]] age sundry infants and all wanted supplies of food for they were faine to [[unclear]] must they | ||
Revision as of 20:05, 28 May 2020
And burnt the day before , this fact was chardged upon Som? of these crossed out Indians of wamesit, but they were innocent as was after ward charged?, for some skulking indians of the enimy, that formerly lived about Groton unclear unclearunclear wherof was named Nathaniel. hee & his party unclear this and unclear mischeefe afterward m unclear unclear houses at Chelmsford. And one principle design of the enimy was to unclear a differente, unclear the English & praying indians living at wamesit. that so unclear unclear either bee returned? by the English? or negotiated to unclear to the enimy. this Nathaniel was afterward taken at Cochecho : and executed at Boston who confesed? the some? Moreover Lieutenant Richardson? , whose hay was Burnt was a person, welbeloved of these? indians at wamesit & their great friend, who did not unclear as he told unclear, that any of the wamesit men had burnt his hay. But others were of a contrary mind willing to give? credit to any report unclear the praying indians & accordingly by unclear to the Genll? court unclear an order for a troope of unclear (as I said Before) to marche? up to wamesit & bring downe those indians of wamesit to Boston: this matter might? have been accomplished as wel by 2 men as 40 croopers? for the indians upon the unclear message? from the court, would readily have obeyed. upon the 20th of october mr Joseph Cooke of cambridge was sent downs (by Cornel oakey & comanded the troope) onto the court to informe, & the wamesit Indians were upon the way comin downe according to order, And unclear unclear be unclear on the morrow, unclear has aquainted the court unclear they? were in number about 145 men women and children, whereof about 33 were men that they were all unarmed. that many of them were naked and unclear of them decripit? with age sundry infants and all wanted supplies of food for they were faine to unclear must they