.MTA2MA.NzE2NjQ

can only be allowed when the matter of the law is sinful and forbidden by the higher power; not when it is judged inexpedient, or unprofitable for of this subjects are not to judge, but the law gives only" (on Prom. 13?) Again, it is my opinion that neither the wickedness of rulers, the injustice of their laws, nor the cruelty of their administration, can be urged as a reason for disobedience. Here also, permit me to introduce the remarks of Dr. Scott. The jews entertained various scruples on the lawfulness of obeying heathen magistrates. The apostle therefore used the most decisive language on this subject. Every saint or person, whether a jewish or gentile convert, private christian or minister, or however distinguished by miraculous gifts, or by his station in the church, was absolutely required to be subject to the authority and edicts of those who held authority in the state, that is, in all things lawful. The higher powers at home were not only heathen, but oppressive and persecuting powers, and Nero who was then emperor, was a monster of cruelty, caprice & wickedness, yet no exception was made on that account. Some have urged against the interpretation here given that if this be indeed the rule of our religion, it lays it open to the charge of abetting tyranny and being inemical [sic: inimical] to civil liberty. But I apprehend