.OTk5.NjUxMjM: Difference between revisions
imported>Sv2 (Created page with "that I considered Woodward a very valuable Officer & that unless he Woodward unclear himself to be retired that I certainly hoped that he would not be. Woodward had rece...") |
imported>Sv2 No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
that I considered Woodward a very valuable Officer & that unless he Woodward | that I considered Woodward a very valuable Officer & that unless he Woodward desired himself to be retired that I certainly hoped that he would not be. | ||
Woodward had received the order to appear & had written to the Recorder that he would not be able to be here before the 1st of May. | Woodward had received the order to appear & had written to the Recorder that he would not be able to be here before the 1st of May. | ||
I told the Recorder that | I told the Recorder that I would cheerfully appear before the Board & testify as to Lieut. Woodward's ability & worth as an officer if it was so [[unclear]] & he informed me that he would leave me subpoenaed. So if the Court should adjourn before May 1st (I do not that it will [[unclear]]) - Why I will be held here to testify in Woodward's case. | ||
I will write a note to Woodward after I finish this to you - as I did not answer his last letter rec'd before I left Concho. | I will write a note to Woodward after I finish this to you - as I did not answer his last letter rec'd before I left Concho. | ||
I am in | I am in receipt to-day of | ||
Latest revision as of 18:28, 3 April 2020
that I considered Woodward a very valuable Officer & that unless he Woodward desired himself to be retired that I certainly hoped that he would not be.
Woodward had received the order to appear & had written to the Recorder that he would not be able to be here before the 1st of May.
I told the Recorder that I would cheerfully appear before the Board & testify as to Lieut. Woodward's ability & worth as an officer if it was so unclear & he informed me that he would leave me subpoenaed. So if the Court should adjourn before May 1st (I do not that it will unclear) - Why I will be held here to testify in Woodward's case.
I will write a note to Woodward after I finish this to you - as I did not answer his last letter rec'd before I left Concho.
I am in receipt to-day of