.MTQx.MzMxODk: Difference between revisions
imported>Christian W Mobley No edit summary |
imported>Christian W Mobley No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
men might be happy in [[unclear]] t. excellency of religion | men might be happy in [[unclear]] t. excellency of religion | ||
t [[unclear]] of wh. would consist in their loving | t [[unclear]] of wh. would consist in their loving | ||
him aught. | him aught. Moties of this kind | ||
might be multiplied without end: | |||
they help in t take up t idea how it becomes | |||
t christians duty & nateral for him | |||
to desire t. right kind of love of all men | |||
& as he decides this he is | |||
to set t example in loving all men, | |||
as he loves hims. & this is t rule | |||
wh. is t law & t ppts. Nothing else | |||
is X But again let it be noticed that for a | |||
christian to love all men as he loves hims. does | |||
not guide him to | |||
love all men in all respects alike for | |||
instance: It does not guide him to take | |||
delight & complacency in those who | |||
appear to be enemies to G. he cannot love their | |||
unholy life & conversation. He cannot love | |||
their disposion who in continually using agt |
Latest revision as of 18:56, 24 March 2020
it is their duty to love t brethren of wh. he is one, this is a motive wh. almost infinitely ought to exceed his own private happiness, although his private happiness might be one motive. Another motive why t. christian disires t love of all men, is that all men might be happy in unclear t. excellency of religion t unclear of wh. would consist in their loving him aught. Moties of this kind might be multiplied without end: they help in t take up t idea how it becomes t christians duty & nateral for him to desire t. right kind of love of all men & as he decides this he is to set t example in loving all men, as he loves hims. & this is t rule wh. is t law & t ppts. Nothing else is X But again let it be noticed that for a christian to love all men as he loves hims. does not guide him to love all men in all respects alike for instance: It does not guide him to take delight & complacency in those who appear to be enemies to G. he cannot love their unholy life & conversation. He cannot love their disposion who in continually using agt