.NDI.MjIzNTA: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 26: Line 26:
not by the [Son?] of God take away the site of any
not by the [Son?] of God take away the site of any
man. If any Reader please he shall [hear?] what
man. If any Reader please he shall [hear?] what
old [in?] [Baernard?] of Batcomb saith to a Case,
old [in?] [Jaernard?] of Batcomb saith to a Case,
like this & the former.                His
like this & the former.                His

Latest revision as of 00:00, 17 November 2019

The things which have been mentioned make way for, and bring us unto the second case which is to come under our consideracon. Viz. If one bewitched be struck down [crossed out - witches?with the?] at the looke, or Cast of the eye of another and after that recovered again by a touch [crossed out: o] from the same person, is not this an infallible proof that the party sus= pected & complained of is in league with the divel. ANSWER it must be owned that by such things as these Witch= crafts have been discovered more than once or twice & that an ill fame or other circum stances attending the suspected party, this may be a good ground for Examination: but this alone doth not afford sufficient matter for Conviction. As spectres or Divels appearing in the shape of persons that have been murdered, de= claring that they were murdered by such persons in Such a place, may give Just occasion for the magistrates enquiry into the matter. One [?] [Sidenote - Webster displaying of Suppos'd witchcraft p. 2g [illegible] 30d] great witch Advocate(d) confeseth that by this means ^murders have brought to light: yet that alone if Other circumstances did not concur would not by the [Son?] of God take away the site of any man. If any Reader please he shall [hear?] what old [in?] [Jaernard?] of Batcomb saith to a Case, like this & the former. His