.NDI.MjIzNDg: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "by some providence discovers the fraud of the devils that so like Innocent(?) may be vindicated, or if not it is to bring them to repentance for some sin or to try their patri...")
 
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
by some providence discovers the fraud of the devils that so like Innocent(?) may be vindicated, or if not it is to bring them to repentance for some sin or to try their patrinos(?). It is hard to see such words dropping from the pen of a Jesuit(?).As for protestant writers I cannot call to mind our(?)  of anytold  that doth deny the possibility of the affirmative  in the question before us.((a) printed at Frankfurt anno1689)  Dr. Henkenbaus(?)  hath lately published (a)   a learned X elaborate(?) oiscourse(?)  concerning the right method of curing such as are obsessed  with caco(?)demons  in which (pag105) he asserts that satan may possibly assumed the form of innocent pious reforms that so thereby he might destroy their reputations X  expose then to undue punishments . As for our English Didnos(?) there are not many greater Casuists(?)  then mr. Perkins.Nor do I know any and that half written on the card(?)  of witchcraft with more judgement X clearways(?)  of understanding . he hath therefor(?) words (b) If a man being dangerously  sick X like to dy upon suspicion will takeit upon his death that such on and(?)  hath bewitched him Hy(?) an allegation which may move the judge to examine the party but is of no momment  for conviction ((c) in his witch craft discovers p.277)  the like is asserted by our Coapre (?)  Mr. Bernard once a famous minister at Batcomb in Somerset  his book called a guide to grand juryman in cases of witchcraft a solis(?) Xwise (?)  realizes what his judgement was in the case now under debate we may see pag. 204.210 where his words are this(?)  an apparition  of the party suspected whom the affliction in their fits seen to see is a great suspicion yet this is but presumption this a strong and becomes this apparitions are wrought by the Devil and can represent  to this fancy such as those paralysis(?)  used to fear in whcih his representatoin he may as well by as in his other wchufs(?) for if the devil can represent  wich seeming samuel saying see Gods afiowing(?)  out earth to beguile saul may we not think he can represent  common ordnary person men or woman unrengerable  though no witch to the fancy of cain performs to decieve them X other that will give credit to the devil thus mr bernard
[underlined: by some providence discovers the fraud of the Devils, that so the
Innocent may be vindicated, or if not it is to bring them to Re-
pentance for some sin or to try their patience.]  It is rare to see  
such words dropping from the pen of a Jesuite. As for Protestant
writers, I cannot call to mind one of any note that doth deny  
the possibility of the Affirmative in the question before us.
[margin note: (a) printed at Frankfurt anno 1689]
[underlined: Dr. Henkelius] hath lately published (a) a learned & elaborate  
discourse concerning [underlined: the right method of curing such as are obses-
sed with caco daemons] in which (pag 105) he asserts that [underlined: Satan
may possibly assume the form of innocent & pious persons, that so  
thereby he might destroy their reputations & expose them to un-
due punishments.]  As for our English [Didnies?], there are not many  
greater Casuists then Mr. [underlined: Perkins]. Nor do I know any one that hath
written on the case of witchcraft with more judgment & clearness
of understanding. He hath these words (b) [underlined: If a man being dan-
[Margin note: (b) discourse of witchcraft. ch.7. sect 2 p. 644]
gerously sick & like to dy upon suspition will take it upon his  
death, that such an one hath bewitched him. It is an allegation  
which may moove the Judge to examine the party, but is of no  
moment for conviction.]  The like is asserted by Mr [underlined:Cooper] (c)
[Margin note: (c) in by witchcraft discovered, p.277]
Mr [underlined: Bernard] (once a famous minister at [underlined: Batcomb] in Somerse
his book calld [underlined: a Guide to Grand Jurymen in cases of witchcraft],s
a solid & wise treatise. what his judgment was in the case now  
under debate, we may see, pag 209. 210 where his words are these
'An Apparition of the party suspected, whome the afflicted in their  
'fits seem to see, is a great suspicion — yet this is but a pre-
'sumption tho a strong one, because those apparitions are  
'wrought by the Devil, w^o can Represent to the fancy such as the
'partyes used to feare in which his Representation he may as
'well by as in his other witness. For if the Devil can Represent
'ye witch-seeming Samuel, saying I see Gods ascending out of ye
'earth to beguile Saul, may wee not think he can Represent
'common ordinary person, man or woman, unregenerate though  
'no witch to the fancy of vain persons to deceive them & other  
'that will give credit to the devill.  Thus Mr. [underlined: Bernard]

Latest revision as of 13:33, 4 July 2017

[underlined: by some providence discovers the fraud of the Devils, that so the Innocent may be vindicated, or if not it is to bring them to Re- pentance for some sin or to try their patience.] It is rare to see such words dropping from the pen of a Jesuite. As for Protestant writers, I cannot call to mind one of any note that doth deny the possibility of the Affirmative in the question before us. [margin note: (a) printed at Frankfurt anno 1689] [underlined: Dr. Henkelius] hath lately published (a) a learned & elaborate discourse concerning [underlined: the right method of curing such as are obses- sed with caco daemons] in which (pag 105) he asserts that [underlined: Satan may possibly assume the form of innocent & pious persons, that so thereby he might destroy their reputations & expose them to un- due punishments.] As for our English [Didnies?], there are not many greater Casuists then Mr. [underlined: Perkins]. Nor do I know any one that hath written on the case of witchcraft with more judgment & clearness of understanding. He hath these words (b) [underlined: If a man being dan- [Margin note: (b) discourse of witchcraft. ch.7. sect 2 p. 644] gerously sick & like to dy upon suspition will take it upon his death, that such an one hath bewitched him. It is an allegation which may moove the Judge to examine the party, but is of no moment for conviction.] The like is asserted by Mr [underlined:Cooper] (c) [Margin note: (c) in by witchcraft discovered, p.277] Mr [underlined: Bernard] (once a famous minister at [underlined: Batcomb] in Somerse his book calld [underlined: a Guide to Grand Jurymen in cases of witchcraft],s a solid & wise treatise. what his judgment was in the case now under debate, we may see, pag 209. 210 where his words are these 'An Apparition of the party suspected, whome the afflicted in their 'fits seem to see, is a great suspicion — yet this is but a pre- 'sumption tho a strong one, because those apparitions are 'wrought by the Devil, w^o can Represent to the fancy such as the 'partyes used to feare in which his Representation he may as 'well by as in his other witness. For if the Devil can Represent 'ye witch-seeming Samuel, saying I see Gods ascending out of ye 'earth to beguile Saul, may wee not think he can Represent 'common ordinary person, man or woman, unregenerate though 'no witch to the fancy of vain persons to deceive them & other 'that will give credit to the devill. Thus Mr. [underlined: Bernard]

Retrieved from "https://digital.newberry.org/transcribe/wiki/index.php?title=.NDI.MjIzNDg&oldid=4651"