.NDI.MjIzNDE: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
never Suffer this to God. For both in former and in latter ages examples more of have not been wanting. no longer since then the last winter there was much discourse in London concerning a Gentle woman unto whom her dead Son (and another unto whom she know not) had disappeared. Coming then in London I was willing to Satisfie my Self by Inquiring into the [2 crossed out words] truth of what was reported. And February 23 1691. my Brother (who is now a Pastor to a congregation in that city) and I discoursed the Gentle woman Spoken of. She told us that a Son of hers who had been a very Civil young man, but more Airy in his temper than was pleasing to his Serious Mother, being dead She was much concerned in her thoughts about his condition in the other world. But a fortnight after his death he appeard unto her, saying, mother you are foli citory [crossed out: of] about my Eternal welfare, trouble your self no more for I am happy. & so vanished. Should this be a continuall intercourse between the visible & the invisi [word carried over] ble world, would breed confusion. But thonow to in [for?] that the great ruler of this Universe will never permitt anything of this nature to be, is an in--[word carried over] consequent conclusion. Let me further addhere it has [word crossed out: illegible]  very Seldom been known that Satan has personated an inocent man doing an ill thing. but [crossed out word: God] Provedence hath found out Some way for their vindication Either they have been able to prove that they wer in another place when that [fact?] was doing or the Like. so that perhaps there [word crossed out] [illegible] never was an instance of any inocent person condemned, in any court of judicature on Earth, only [know?] Satan deluding & imposing on the ima [word carried over] ginations of men, when never the [life?] the witneses, Juries & Judges were all to be excused from blame.
never Suffer this to bee. For both in former and in latter ages examples hereof have not been wanting. No longer since then the last winter ther was much discourse in [underlined: London] concerning a Gentlewoman unto whom her dead Son (and another whom she knew not) had appeared. Being then in [underlined: London] I was willing to Satisfie my Self by Enquiring into the [2 crossed out words] truth of what was reported. And February 23 1691. my Brother (who is now a Pastor to a congregation in that city) and I discoursed the Gentlewoman Spoken of. She told us that a Son of hers who had been a very Civil young man, but more Airy in his [illegible word crossed out] temper than was pleasing to his Serious Mother, being dead She was much concerned in her thoughts about his condition in the other world. But a fortnight after his death he appeard unto her, saying, mother you are solicitory [crossed out: of] about my Eternall welfare, trouble your self no more for I am happy. & so vanishd. Should ther be a continuall intercourse between the visible & the invisible world, twould breed confusion. But thence to infer that the great ruler of the Universe will never permitt any thing of this nature to be, is an inconsequent conclusion. Let me further add here, it has [word crossed out: been]  very Seldom been known that Satan has personated an inocent man doing an ill thing. but [crossed out word: God] Providence hath found out Some way for their vindication Either they have been able to prove that they wer in another place when that fact was doing or the Like. so that perhaps there [word crossed out: illegible] never was an instance of any inocent person condemned, in any court of judicature on Earth, only threw Satan deluding & imposing on the imaginations of men, when nevertheless the witnesses, Juries & Judges were all to be excused from blame.

Latest revision as of 06:16, 2 July 2017

never Suffer this to bee. For both in former and in latter ages examples hereof have not been wanting. No longer since then the last winter ther was much discourse in [underlined: London] concerning a Gentlewoman unto whom her dead Son (and another whom she knew not) had appeared. Being then in [underlined: London] I was willing to Satisfie my Self by Enquiring into the [2 crossed out words] truth of what was reported. And February 23 1691. my Brother (who is now a Pastor to a congregation in that city) and I discoursed the Gentlewoman Spoken of. She told us that a Son of hers who had been a very Civil young man, but more Airy in his [illegible word crossed out] temper than was pleasing to his Serious Mother, being dead She was much concerned in her thoughts about his condition in the other world. But a fortnight after his death he appeard unto her, saying, mother you are solicitory [crossed out: of] about my Eternall welfare, trouble your self no more for I am happy. & so vanishd. Should ther be a continuall intercourse between the visible & the invisible world, twould breed confusion. But thence to infer that the great ruler of the Universe will never permitt any thing of this nature to be, is an inconsequent conclusion. Let me further add here, it has [word crossed out: been] very Seldom been known that Satan has personated an inocent man doing an ill thing. but [crossed out word: God] Providence hath found out Some way for their vindication Either they have been able to prove that they wer in another place when that fact was doing or the Like. so that perhaps there [word crossed out: illegible] never was an instance of any inocent person condemned, in any court of judicature on Earth, only threw Satan deluding & imposing on the imaginations of men, when nevertheless the witnesses, Juries & Judges were all to be excused from blame.