.MTA2NA.NzIyMzU: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hearthemelody
No edit summary
imported>Kitsapian
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
obligations to  
[[ top left margin head note:  obligations to individuals - second branch - removal & subsistence.]]  be obtained to another question, upon which I have also sought in vain for light. I allude to the amount granted by the third section of the act of June 12th, 1838, for blankets, clothing, medicine, medical assistance, and whatever might "facilitate the removal of the Cherokees". This is estimated at seventy five thousand dollars, twenty five thousand having been deducted from the entire appropriation of one hundred thousand dollars for other objects specified in the act. Of this I learn that sixty seven thousand yet remain in the Treasury; so the expenditure from the fund in question may be called eight thousand dollars. For example: Amount granted  $75,000:-- Balance of that amount now on hand  67,000:-- Probably expended for the objects of the appropriation $8,000:-It merely remains, therefore, to be ascertained, whether the eight thousand dollars drawn out of the Treasury have really been devoted to the purposes for which the grant was made by congress. It may also not be irrelevant to inquire, as the act for the supply expressly allows its being employed for any purpose which "the President may deem proper to facilitate the removal of the Cherokees", how so large a portion of it happened to have remained on hand after all the other funds for the removal of the Cherokees were exhausted? -And whether, with this fund
individuals - second  
branch - removal &
subsistence.
 
be obtained to another question, upon which
I have also sought in vain for light. I allude
to the amount granted by the third section of
the act of June 12th, 1838, for blankets, clothing,
medicine, medical assistance, and whatever
might "facilitate the removal of the Cherokees".
This is estimated at seventy five thousand
dollars, twenty five thousand having been
deducted from the entire appropriation of
one hundred thousand dollars for other objects  
specified in the act. Of this I learn that
sixty seven thousand yet remain in the  
Treasure; so the expenditure from the fund in  
question may be called eight thousand dollars.
For example:  
Amount granted  $75,000:-
Balance of that amount now on hand  67,000:-
Probably expended for the objects of the appropriation $8,000:-
It merely remains, therefore, to be  
ascertained, whether the eight thousand dollars
drawn out of the Treasure have really been  
devoted to the purposes for which the grant
was made by congress. It may also not be
irrelevant to inquire, as the act for the supply
expressly allows its being employed for any
purpose which "the President may deem
proper to facilitate the removal of the Cherokees",
how so large a portion of it happened
to have remained on hand after all the
other funds for the removal of the Cherokees
were exhausted? - And whether, with this
fund

Latest revision as of 11:01, 13 July 2020

top left margin head note: obligations to individuals - second branch - removal & subsistence. be obtained to another question, upon which I have also sought in vain for light. I allude to the amount granted by the third section of the act of June 12th, 1838, for blankets, clothing, medicine, medical assistance, and whatever might "facilitate the removal of the Cherokees". This is estimated at seventy five thousand dollars, twenty five thousand having been deducted from the entire appropriation of one hundred thousand dollars for other objects specified in the act. Of this I learn that sixty seven thousand yet remain in the Treasury; so the expenditure from the fund in question may be called eight thousand dollars. For example: Amount granted $75,000:-- Balance of that amount now on hand 67,000:-- Probably expended for the objects of the appropriation $8,000:-- It merely remains, therefore, to be ascertained, whether the eight thousand dollars drawn out of the Treasury have really been devoted to the purposes for which the grant was made by congress. It may also not be irrelevant to inquire, as the act for the supply expressly allows its being employed for any purpose which "the President may deem proper to facilitate the removal of the Cherokees", how so large a portion of it happened to have remained on hand after all the other funds for the removal of the Cherokees were exhausted? -- And whether, with this fund