.MTU0NQ.MTM1MzQ1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "him to be a part of machine socialism. A bit of people think of social forms as destroying individuality but it is possible that they are needed as a protection.") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
him to be a part of machine socialism. A | him to be a part of machine socialism. A lot of people think of social forms as destroying individuality but it is possible that they are needed as a protection. All living people are egoists and as a rule when they get too close they do things to one another. Nature really represents to me people and the life of the universe combined. I hardly even paint a landscape where there isn't a house or some suggestion of people. I argued with you about it at [[symremans?]] and it makes Kach and me mad when I say it but I don't believe a permanent sex relations is possible between a man and a woman. It has to evolve into something else. I don't think marriage with the idea of sexual faithfulness will ever work. But |
Latest revision as of 21:36, 20 June 2023
him to be a part of machine socialism. A lot of people think of social forms as destroying individuality but it is possible that they are needed as a protection. All living people are egoists and as a rule when they get too close they do things to one another. Nature really represents to me people and the life of the universe combined. I hardly even paint a landscape where there isn't a house or some suggestion of people. I argued with you about it at symremans? and it makes Kach and me mad when I say it but I don't believe a permanent sex relations is possible between a man and a woman. It has to evolve into something else. I don't think marriage with the idea of sexual faithfulness will ever work. But