.MTYzMw.MTQ0MDQz: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "in pencil Cary March 17, 1973 Dear Gladys and Jack, We are years behind in answering your letters. Thanks for the "American Book Collector" and your good review of Jo...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
March 17, 1973 | March 17, 1973 | ||
Dear Gladys and Jack, | Dear Gladys and Jack, | ||
We are years behind in answering your letters. | We are [[[[underline]] years [[/underline]] behind in answering your letters. | ||
Thanks for the "American Book Collector" and your good review of John's book. | Thanks for the "American Book Collector" and your good review of John's book. | ||
Would you be able to get, autograph, and mail to us the | Would you be able to get, autograph, and mail to us the | ||
Autumn '72 | Autumn '72 and winter '73 issues of NEW LETTERS? That would be great. Hope there are some copies left!! | ||
(Stamps enclosed - let me know if I owe you more.) Many thanks, if you can do this. | |||
a Mich. State student has been interviewing John, reading much of his work, etc. She plans to submit this to | |||
NEW LETTERS. So here's hoping they wish to print an article about Woods. | |||
Dave Ehler wrote 2 very nice reviews of John's work - one was in "NEW: American and Canadian" (or vice versa) | |||
Poetry." The other mag. is "Chicago Review" - current, winter issue - 26th anniversary issue. J. also has poems | |||
[[on side]] RaRietan or some such name | |||
Latest revision as of 18:24, 9 June 2023
in pencil Cary
March 17, 1973
Dear Gladys and Jack,
We are [[underline years /underline behind in answering your letters. Thanks for the "American Book Collector" and your good review of John's book.
Would you be able to get, autograph, and mail to us the Autumn '72 and winter '73 issues of NEW LETTERS? That would be great. Hope there are some copies left!! (Stamps enclosed - let me know if I owe you more.) Many thanks, if you can do this.
a Mich. State student has been interviewing John, reading much of his work, etc. She plans to submit this to
NEW LETTERS. So here's hoping they wish to print an article about Woods.
Dave Ehler wrote 2 very nice reviews of John's work - one was in "NEW: American and Canadian" (or vice versa)
Poetry." The other mag. is "Chicago Review" - current, winter issue - 26th anniversary issue. J. also has poems
on side RaRietan or some such name