.MTM5Ng.MTIwNzQw: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "not long thereafter, the uncleardiscovered upon the personal ugliness of Jiotto, so curiously of to the sovereignty of art; and if tradition is correct in recognizing a...")
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
was common knowledge, without insinuating  
was common knowledge, without insinuating  
doubt on the authenticity of an acquaintanceship on the  
doubt on the authenticity of an acquaintanceship on the  
part of [[Fitrarel?]]. The doubts begin with the
part of [[Fitrarel?]]. The doubts begin with the  
chronological inconsistency of the meeting: if [[unclear]]
contained nothing but pure gold, there would be
[[vain?]] only to hesitate between [[Pisa?]] (the [[Pisa?]]
where Petrarch is thought to have seen Dante),
Romagna and but of all Avignon; To-day we
can only turn the difficult question
to the specialists in the biography of who do not
appear to have posted it. Another, but this time
well-recognized difficulty has to do with the
relations between Jiotto and the [[collector?]], Petrarch
Here, too, the quotation made by [[unclear]] just before
the passage to [[Luido Setti?]]. This deals with
the Testament which closes the Latin works

Latest revision as of 19:25, 14 October 2021

not long thereafter, the uncleardiscovered upon the personal ugliness of Jiotto, so curiously of to the sovereignty of art; and if tradition is correct in recognizing a self portrait in a certain profile of the 'unclear agti unclear, he was not outstanding for unclear. This served only to bring out to what extent the anecdote was common knowledge, without insinuating doubt on the authenticity of an acquaintanceship on the part of Fitrarel?. The doubts begin with the chronological inconsistency of the meeting: if unclear contained nothing but pure gold, there would be vain? only to hesitate between Pisa? (the Pisa? where Petrarch is thought to have seen Dante), Romagna and but of all Avignon; To-day we can only turn the difficult question to the specialists in the biography of who do not appear to have posted it. Another, but this time well-recognized difficulty has to do with the relations between Jiotto and the collector?, Petrarch Here, too, the quotation made by unclear just before the passage to Luido Setti?. This deals with the Testament which closes the Latin works