.MjA1.NDY0OTU: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "And Nathanael said unto him, Canthere? any good thing come out of Nazareth? Philip said unto him. Come and see: John 1. 46 We have here ______ a remarkable case of dee...") |
CastleCourt (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
And Nathanael said unto him, Can | And Nathanael said unto him, Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth? Philip said unto him. Come and see: John 1. 46 | ||
We have here ______ a remarkable case of deep seated religious prejudice - and how it was overturned? | We have here ______ a remarkable case of deep seated religious prejudice - and how it was overturned? | ||
Sir Wm Hamilton says prejudice is a pre-judgment - a judgment made up before sufficient evidence is secured to substantiate the truth in question. It may be a decision without any grounds for it, or it has some how grown up with us, a matter of course. Or, if it involves a Choice, it may be nothing more than of half | [crossed out: "Prejudice," Says] Sir Wm Hamilton [crossed out: is opinion formed on irrational grounds" The primary [?] meaning of the word itself also give us something of a clue to it - good idea of what is meant by it.] says prejudice is a pre-judgment - a judgment made up before sufficient evidence is secured to substantiate the truth in question. It may be a decision without any grounds for it, or it [crossed out: may not involve any special decision, but] has some how grown up with us, a matter of course. Or, if it involves a Choice, it may be nothing more than of half truths - which are sometimes more dangerous than whole errors. It then becomes perverted, or warped judgment. In whatever way it does cone to us, it becomes | ||
Latest revision as of 03:43, 7 April 2021
And Nathanael said unto him, Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth? Philip said unto him. Come and see: John 1. 46 We have here ______ a remarkable case of deep seated religious prejudice - and how it was overturned? [crossed out: "Prejudice," Says] Sir Wm Hamilton [crossed out: is opinion formed on irrational grounds" The primary [?] meaning of the word itself also give us something of a clue to it - good idea of what is meant by it.] says prejudice is a pre-judgment - a judgment made up before sufficient evidence is secured to substantiate the truth in question. It may be a decision without any grounds for it, or it [crossed out: may not involve any special decision, but] has some how grown up with us, a matter of course. Or, if it involves a Choice, it may be nothing more than of half truths - which are sometimes more dangerous than whole errors. It then becomes perverted, or warped judgment. In whatever way it does cone to us, it becomes