.MTI4NA.MTAzMjUz: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "Your Case is most essentially different from that of one whose system, nerves, & spinal energies were worn out & destroyed by gluttony, dissipation, and debauchery. For such a...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Your Case is most essentially different from that of one whose system, nerves, & spinal energies were worn out & destroyed by gluttony, dissipation, and debauchery. For such an one the disease & decay must be arrested, if at all by the Doctors & their most violent remedies. Yours as an injury required simply a chance for nature to get over the injury. Her recuperative energies, if not continually thwarted are great and ever sufficient. | Your Case is most essentially different from that of one whose system, nerves, & spinal energies were worn out & destroyed by gluttony, dissipation, and debauchery. For such an one the disease & decay must be arrested, if at all by the Doctors & their most violent remedies. Yours as an injury required simply a chance for nature to get over the injury. Her recuperative energies, if not continually thwarted are great and ever sufficient. | ||
Your object then in a course of treatment is simply to recover from the effects of what you by bad remedies have done . Of course the Water Cure is the thing. Over & above its acknowledged regenerative properties, it has an advantage possessed by no other treatments or medicines: it has no injurious effect: it leaves nature constantly free to go on with her cure. | Your object then in a course of treatment is simply to recover from the effects of what you by bad remedies have done . Of course the Water Cure is the thing. Over & above its acknowledged regenerative properties, it has an advantage possessed by no other treatments or medicines: it has no injurious effect: it leaves nature constantly free to go on with her cure. | ||
What sort of a chap is Chas. H. Metcalf? Seems to me I should like to see him. Wish I could have been at home at Milo at time of his visit I guess the botanical difficulty is not great. My Books on that subject are not present; but I believe the plant in question the Glycine Afrios, perhaps of Bigelow; but the Afrios, monoica perhaps of Gray, & other Botanists. perhaps. Amphicarpa Monoica of | What sort of a chap is Chas. H. Metcalf? Seems to me I should like to see him. Wish I could have been at home at Milo at time of his visit I guess the botanical difficulty is not great. My Books on that subject are not present; but I believe the plant in question the Glycine Afrios, perhaps of Bigelow; but the Afrios, monoica perhaps of Gray, & other Botanists. perhaps. Amphicarpa Monoica of Nuttall. | ||
I expect it would be one of the best things ever happened to Milo if N. Carrer, N. Dow & J. Macomber, could be "underpinned up to the eaves" at West Thomaston for a term of years: Would it not? | I expect it would be one of the best things ever happened to Milo if N. Carrer, N. Dow & J. Macomber, could be "underpinned up to the eaves" at West Thomaston for a term of years: Would it not? | ||
Latest revision as of 21:28, 9 October 2020
Your Case is most essentially different from that of one whose system, nerves, & spinal energies were worn out & destroyed by gluttony, dissipation, and debauchery. For such an one the disease & decay must be arrested, if at all by the Doctors & their most violent remedies. Yours as an injury required simply a chance for nature to get over the injury. Her recuperative energies, if not continually thwarted are great and ever sufficient. Your object then in a course of treatment is simply to recover from the effects of what you by bad remedies have done . Of course the Water Cure is the thing. Over & above its acknowledged regenerative properties, it has an advantage possessed by no other treatments or medicines: it has no injurious effect: it leaves nature constantly free to go on with her cure. What sort of a chap is Chas. H. Metcalf? Seems to me I should like to see him. Wish I could have been at home at Milo at time of his visit I guess the botanical difficulty is not great. My Books on that subject are not present; but I believe the plant in question the Glycine Afrios, perhaps of Bigelow; but the Afrios, monoica perhaps of Gray, & other Botanists. perhaps. Amphicarpa Monoica of Nuttall. I expect it would be one of the best things ever happened to Milo if N. Carrer, N. Dow & J. Macomber, could be "underpinned up to the eaves" at West Thomaston for a term of years: Would it not?