.MTAxNQ.NjcxNDg: Difference between revisions
imported>DianeBHopper (Created page with "55 James Richardson of Chelmsford was set on fire and burnt the day before. This fact was charged upon some of the unclear of unclear, but they were innocent unclear...") |
imported>DianeBHopper No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
55 | 55 | ||
James Richardson of Chelmsford was set on fire and burnt the day before. This fact was charged upon some of the [[unclear]] of [[unclear]], but they were innocent [[unclear]] afterward cleared, for some skulking [[unclear]] of the enemy that formerly lived about Groton (the principal whereof was named Nathaniel | James Richardson of Chelmsford was set on fire and burnt the day before. This fact was charged upon some of the [[unclear]] of [[unclear]], but they were innocent [[unclear]] afterward cleared, for some skulking [[unclear]] of the enemy that formerly lived about Groton (the principal whereof was named Nathaniel. He and his party did this and other mischief afterwards in burning several [[unclear]] at Chelmsford. And one principal design of the enemy was to begin a difference between the Eng. and [[unclear]] living at [[unclear]], that so they might either be deceived by the Eng. or necessitated to fly to the enemy. This Nathaniel was afterward taken at [[unclear]] and executed at Boston who confessed the same moreover Lieut. Richard Low whose [[unclear]] were burnt was a person well beloved of Rhode [[unclear]]. at [[unclear]] and their great friend who did not apprehend (as he told me) that any of the [[unclear]] men had burned his hay, but others were of a contrary mind to credit to any report against the [[unclear]] Inds. According by their solicitations to | ||
Latest revision as of 01:54, 13 May 2020
55 James Richardson of Chelmsford was set on fire and burnt the day before. This fact was charged upon some of the unclear of unclear, but they were innocent unclear afterward cleared, for some skulking unclear of the enemy that formerly lived about Groton (the principal whereof was named Nathaniel. He and his party did this and other mischief afterwards in burning several unclear at Chelmsford. And one principal design of the enemy was to begin a difference between the Eng. and unclear living at unclear, that so they might either be deceived by the Eng. or necessitated to fly to the enemy. This Nathaniel was afterward taken at unclear and executed at Boston who confessed the same moreover Lieut. Richard Low whose unclear were burnt was a person well beloved of Rhode unclear. at unclear and their great friend who did not apprehend (as he told me) that any of the unclear men had burned his hay, but others were of a contrary mind to credit to any report against the unclear Inds. According by their solicitations to