.MTAzNA.NjkzMTk: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>CastleCourt
(Created page with "[red ink] 1873 official communication addressed to Post Hdqrs. by Captain [?] accusing the Adjutant of doing an act that I had ordered done")
 
imported>CastleCourt
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[red ink] 1873
[red ink] 1873


official communication addressed to Post Hdqrs. by Captain [?] accusing the Adjutant of doing an act that I had ordered done
official communication addressed to Post Hdqrs. by Capt. Catlin accusing the Adjutant of doing an act that I had ordered done (which was not dreamed Capt. C  would take take[sic] to heart)  The Adjutant took the communication as somewhat personal however, the conversation referred to in the charges.  While I do not sustain any junior officer in using such language to a senior, I think the Adjutant was provoked by the communication of Capt. Catlin.  Up to this time these officers have been intimate friends.  In any event I do not think the charges properly made.  Under the circumstances nothing more than "conduct to the prejudice of good order and mil. discipline" can be sustained in my judgement.  I have tried to effect a reconciliation Lieut. Whitney has expressed a willingness to apologize in presence of other officers provided Capt. Catlin retreats what he has stated over his official signature, which up to the present time he had declined to do hence I can only forward the charges for your action.  Lt. Whitney being Judge Advocate of a Genl C.M. and responsible for a large amount of property as A.C.S. I have not placed him in arrest not has Capt. Catlin demanded it (Sgd) Geo. P. Buell, Lt. Col. 11 Inf. Comdg Post.
Respectfully returned to the C.O. Ft. Griffin, Tx.  Lt. Whitney's conduct as described in the first specification cannot be overlooked.  Capt. Catlin's letter may have contained erroneous statements but as it was an official letter to his Comdg officer, it was for the latter to correct it not Lt. Whitney.  In attempting to do so he was the aggressor and should be first to offer reparation.  The trial of officers is to be avoided when possible and it is hoped Lt. Col. Buell can arrange this affair satisfactorily without resort to a Court.  Lieut. Whitney will not be permitted to avail himself of his leave of absence until such time as this is settled or a Court ordered.
DT  May 28, 73
By Command of Brig Genl Augur
(Sgd) C. McKeever AA Genl
[red ink in left margin] Recd back June  29 & ref to AGA D.T.
 
Mo. Mil Div of
[red ink] 172
Endorsement on copy of letter dated May 26 1873 acknowledging receipt of copy of telegram from Hq. Mil. Div. of the Mo. requiring explanation of sending of the transportation of Camp Supply, I.T. to Ft. Griffin Texas; gives explanation (LR 2319 DT 73)  Recd D.T. June 2 1873
Respectfully forwarded to the A. A. Genl. Mil. Div. of the Mo.
I am exceedingly annoyed by the way this transportation has

Latest revision as of 03:17, 27 April 2020

[red ink] 1873

official communication addressed to Post Hdqrs. by Capt. Catlin accusing the Adjutant of doing an act that I had ordered done (which was not dreamed Capt. C would take take[sic] to heart) The Adjutant took the communication as somewhat personal however, the conversation referred to in the charges. While I do not sustain any junior officer in using such language to a senior, I think the Adjutant was provoked by the communication of Capt. Catlin. Up to this time these officers have been intimate friends. In any event I do not think the charges properly made. Under the circumstances nothing more than "conduct to the prejudice of good order and mil. discipline" can be sustained in my judgement. I have tried to effect a reconciliation Lieut. Whitney has expressed a willingness to apologize in presence of other officers provided Capt. Catlin retreats what he has stated over his official signature, which up to the present time he had declined to do hence I can only forward the charges for your action. Lt. Whitney being Judge Advocate of a Genl C.M. and responsible for a large amount of property as A.C.S. I have not placed him in arrest not has Capt. Catlin demanded it (Sgd) Geo. P. Buell, Lt. Col. 11 Inf. Comdg Post. Respectfully returned to the C.O. Ft. Griffin, Tx. Lt. Whitney's conduct as described in the first specification cannot be overlooked. Capt. Catlin's letter may have contained erroneous statements but as it was an official letter to his Comdg officer, it was for the latter to correct it not Lt. Whitney. In attempting to do so he was the aggressor and should be first to offer reparation. The trial of officers is to be avoided when possible and it is hoped Lt. Col. Buell can arrange this affair satisfactorily without resort to a Court. Lieut. Whitney will not be permitted to avail himself of his leave of absence until such time as this is settled or a Court ordered. DT May 28, 73 By Command of Brig Genl Augur (Sgd) C. McKeever AA Genl [red ink in left margin] Recd back June 29 & ref to AGA D.T.

Mo. Mil Div of [red ink] 172 Endorsement on copy of letter dated May 26 1873 acknowledging receipt of copy of telegram from Hq. Mil. Div. of the Mo. requiring explanation of sending of the transportation of Camp Supply, I.T. to Ft. Griffin Texas; gives explanation (LR 2319 DT 73) Recd D.T. June 2 1873 Respectfully forwarded to the A. A. Genl. Mil. Div. of the Mo. I am exceedingly annoyed by the way this transportation has