.MTAx.MjUzNDM: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert Roth
No edit summary
imported>Robert Roth
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Remsen March 6st 1880 Dear friend Jannie your letter was receaved this morning I wish now that I had [[answered?]] the first for I felt then in better humor than I do now. I told you that the  Law Case was deside in [[Freemont?]] favor but that was not so it is in David favor their case was refer to Judg Persely [[fremont?]] is rather selfish had no witness but himself but David had a contract that was made in the  year 1865 between Mary Roberts an Elias Jones  that Jones was to pay 10[[unclear]] a year for the use of that Land he David wrote the paper Mary R and Elias signed and David witness to it the children never heard about befor nor do they beleave that their father ever signed that contract can you believe such [[unclear]] I sooner bleave that it was working last [[haying?]] or affter that
[[embossed stationery with prominent black shield figure]]
 
Remsen March 6st 1880  
    Dear friend Jannie your letter was receaved this morning I wish now that I had answer the first for I felt then in better humor than I do now. I told you that the  Law Case was desidd in [[Freemont?]] favor but that was not so it is in David favor their case was refer to Judg Persely freemont is rather selfish had no witness but himself but David had a contract that was made in the  year 1865 between Mary Roberts an Elias Jones  that Jones was to pay 10 [[unclear]] a year for the use of that Land he David wrote the paper Mary R and Elias signed and David witness to it the children never heard about befor nor do they beleave that their father ever signed that contract can you believe such [[scribble]] I sooner bleave that it was working last haying or affter that

Latest revision as of 16:47, 15 December 2020

embossed stationery with prominent black shield figure

Remsen March 6st 1880

    Dear friend Jannie your letter was receaved this morning I wish now that I had answer the first for I felt then in better humor than I do now. I told you that the  Law Case was desidd in Freemont? favor but that was not so it is in David favor their case was refer to Judg Persely freemont is rather selfish had no witness but himself but David had a contract that was made in the  year 1865 between Mary Roberts an Elias Jones  that Jones was to pay 10 unclear a year for the use of that Land he David wrote the paper Mary R and Elias signed and David witness to it the children never heard about befor nor do they beleave that their father ever signed that contract can you believe such scribble I sooner bleave that it was working last haying or affter that