.MTAx.MjUzNDM: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Kdewin1 No edit summary |
imported>Robert Roth No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Remsen March 6st 1880 | [[embossed stationery with prominent black shield figure]] | ||
Dear friend Jannie your letter was receaved this morning I wish now that | |||
I had | Remsen March 6st 1880 | ||
humor than I do now. I told you that the Law | Dear friend Jannie your letter was receaved this morning I wish now that I had answer the first for I felt then in better humor than I do now. I told you that the Law Case was desidd in [[Freemont?]] favor but that was not so it is in David favor their case was refer to Judg Persely freemont is rather selfish had no witness but himself but David had a contract that was made in the year 1865 between Mary Roberts an Elias Jones that Jones was to pay 10 [[unclear]] a year for the use of that Land he David wrote the paper Mary R and Elias signed and David witness to it the children never heard about befor nor do they beleave that their father ever signed that contract can you believe such [[scribble]] I sooner bleave that it was working last haying or affter that | ||
Case was | |||
was not so it is in David favor | |||
their case was refer to Judg Persely | |||
is rather selfish had no witness but himself | |||
but David had a contract that was made in the | |||
year 1865 between Mary Roberts an Elias Jones | |||
that Jones was to pay 10[[unclear]] a year for the use of | |||
that Land he David wrote the paper Mary R | |||
and Elias signed and David witness to it | |||
the children never heard about befor | |||
nor do they beleave that their father ever | |||
signed that contract can you believe | |||
such [[ | |||
was working last | |||
Latest revision as of 16:47, 15 December 2020
embossed stationery with prominent black shield figure
Remsen March 6st 1880
Dear friend Jannie your letter was receaved this morning I wish now that I had answer the first for I felt then in better humor than I do now. I told you that the Law Case was desidd in Freemont? favor but that was not so it is in David favor their case was refer to Judg Persely freemont is rather selfish had no witness but himself but David had a contract that was made in the year 1865 between Mary Roberts an Elias Jones that Jones was to pay 10 unclear a year for the use of that Land he David wrote the paper Mary R and Elias signed and David witness to it the children never heard about befor nor do they beleave that their father ever signed that contract can you believe such scribble I sooner bleave that it was working last haying or affter that