.OTA1.NTY5Nzk: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Second? Kingsley by Weed? of General and Special warranty conyeyed Lot 4 to W.S. Sadd but no mention is made in the Weed? of the partition wall or of the agreement...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Second?]] Kingsley by [[Weed?]] of General and Special warranty conyeyed Lot 4 to W.S. Sadd but no mention is made in the [[Weed?]] of the partition wall or of the agreement between Kingsly and [[Risley?]] & [[ | [[Second?]] Kingsley by [[Weed?]] of General and Special warranty conyeyed Lot 4 to W.S. Sadd but no mention is made in the [[Weed?]] of the partition wall or of the agreement between Kingsly and [[Risley?]] & [[Hunsareer?]] | ||
Third William S. Sadd by [[liver?]] conveyance transfered Lot 4 to H.W. Corbett | Third William S. Sadd by [[liver?]] conveyance transfered Lot 4 to H.W. Corbett | ||
Fourth In 1869 and whilst Mr. Corbett was the owner of Lot 4 Tisley & [[ | Fourth In 1869 and whilst Mr. Corbett was the owner of Lot 4 Tisley & [[Hunsareer?]] erected a [[unsure]] Building on Lot 3 and used the wall as proved in the agreement | ||
Under this state of facts is Mr. Corbett entitled to recieve the $804.36 of Risley & [[Hunsareer?]] or is Mr. Kingsly entitled to the money: | |||
Mr. Corbett claims that he is entitled to the money because he was the owner of Lot 4 when the wall was used by Risley & [[Hunsareer?]] | |||
Latest revision as of 15:06, 24 March 2020
Second? Kingsley by Weed? of General and Special warranty conyeyed Lot 4 to W.S. Sadd but no mention is made in the Weed? of the partition wall or of the agreement between Kingsly and Risley? & Hunsareer? Third William S. Sadd by liver? conveyance transfered Lot 4 to H.W. Corbett Fourth In 1869 and whilst Mr. Corbett was the owner of Lot 4 Tisley & Hunsareer? erected a unsure Building on Lot 3 and used the wall as proved in the agreement Under this state of facts is Mr. Corbett entitled to recieve the $804.36 of Risley & Hunsareer? or is Mr. Kingsly entitled to the money: Mr. Corbett claims that he is entitled to the money because he was the owner of Lot 4 when the wall was used by Risley & Hunsareer?