.OTky.NjQxNzE: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
vote James? yes the very name is more terrible than 50000 British bayonets - but not so much the James | vote [[James]]? yes the very name is more terrible than 50000 British bayonets - but not so much the [[James]] - there is the excise of the [[slamp?]] | ||
& the | & the salt duty - we can get along without them. loans are better treasury notes are better than loans. [[Indeed?]] can a system grow out of this discordance? There are only two alternatives, the expenses being ahead authorized by laws and must repeat the law or raise the money to repeat the laws will be to abandon in the most deliberate | ||
manner the contest & money to a limited amount only can be raised by loans - a majority therefore will be found at last to reunite in a system of [[unclear]] - direct and indirect. The subject of the letter will be probably spirits, carriages, refined sugar, licenses to retailers stamps on [[Band paper?]]. Is it surprising then that in the most of this perplexity we should require your countenances and encouragement. for my self I denounce all further [[tempouring?]] or indecision and our foreign relations continuing the same nothing but a declaration of | |||
Latest revision as of 18:58, 27 February 2020
vote James? yes the very name is more terrible than 50000 British bayonets - but not so much the James - there is the excise of the slamp? & the salt duty - we can get along without them. loans are better treasury notes are better than loans. Indeed? can a system grow out of this discordance? There are only two alternatives, the expenses being ahead authorized by laws and must repeat the law or raise the money to repeat the laws will be to abandon in the most deliberate manner the contest & money to a limited amount only can be raised by loans - a majority therefore will be found at last to reunite in a system of unclear - direct and indirect. The subject of the letter will be probably spirits, carriages, refined sugar, licenses to retailers stamps on Band paper?. Is it surprising then that in the most of this perplexity we should require your countenances and encouragement. for my self I denounce all further tempouring? or indecision and our foreign relations continuing the same nothing but a declaration of