.NDI.MjIzNTM: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "the [illegible] reasonable doubt remaining, whether the Divel alone or with the consent and contrast of the suspected person hath produced that wonder- ful effect; with what R...")
 
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
the [illegible] reasonable doubt remaining, whether
"the least reasonable doubt remaining, whether
the Divel alone or with the consent and contrast
"the Divel alone or with the consent and contrast
of the suspected person hath produced that wonder-
"of the suspected person hath produced that wonder=
ful effect; with what Religion or Reason [illegible]
"ful effect; with what Religion or Reason can any
man incline rather to credit the Divels mouth
"man incline rather to credit the Divels mouth=
in the bewitched, then to pity the accused, and so
"in the bewitched, then to pity the accused, and be=
[illegible] them against the subtilty of a deceitful
"leive them against the subtilty of a deceitful
divel? If the Divel of Divine [illegible], may cause
"divel? If the Divel by Divine Permission, may cause
supernaturall concomitance and consequence to
"supernaturall concomitances & Consequences to
attend the natural actions of men without
"attend the natural actions of men without
their allowance, as is [illegible] [illegible] [illegible] per-
"their Allowance, as is manefest in possessed per-
son how is it reasonable and [illegible], that [illegible]
"sons, how is it reasonable and Just, that therin
positions of the Divel should be [illegible] unto
"positions of the Divel should be Imputed unto
any man? And saith he / God forbid that the Divels
"any man? & saith he / God forbid that the Divels
signs and wonders [illegible] [illegible] his [illegible] should
"signs and wonders [crossed out: Should] nay his Truths should
become [illegible] all allegations or evidences in
"become any Legall allegations or evidences in
sane. we may therfore [illegible] it unjust that
"Sane. we may therfore account it unjust that
the fore named miraculory effect by the Divell
"the fore named miraculory Effect by the Divell
wrought and [illegible] by the bewitched, should be
"wrought and Imputed by the bewitched, should be
[illegible] an infallible mark against any man
"Esteemed an infallible mark against any man
as therfore convinced a witch. for that the Divel and the
"as therfore [crossed out word] convinced a Witch. for [carot] that the Divel and the
bewitched have so decyphered him! [illegible] [illegible] learn-
"bewitched have so decyphered him! Thus that learn=
ed man. But to the case in hand I have [illegible]-
ed man. But to the case in hand I have se=
[illegible] all things to offer.
verall things to offer.
It is possible that the persons [illegible] may be
1 It is possible that the persons [in Question may be
possessed with a [illegible]daemon. That bewitched per-
possessed with a Caco daemon. That bewitched per
sons [illegible] many [illegible] possessed with evil
sons are really many times possessed with Evil
spirits is most certain. And as M Perkins ob-
Spirits is most certain. And as Mr _Perkins_ ob=
serves, no man can prove but that witchcraft might
serves, no man can prove but that witchcraft might

Latest revision as of 12:31, 15 July 2017

"the least reasonable doubt remaining, whether "the Divel alone or with the consent and contrast "of the suspected person hath produced that wonder= "ful effect; with what Religion or Reason can any "man incline rather to credit the Divels mouth= "in the bewitched, then to pity the accused, and be= "leive them against the subtilty of a deceitful "divel? If the Divel by Divine Permission, may cause "supernaturall concomitances & Consequences to "attend the natural actions of men without "their Allowance, as is manefest in possessed per- "sons, how is it reasonable and Just, that therin "positions of the Divel should be Imputed unto "any man? & saith he / God forbid that the Divels "signs and wonders [crossed out: Should] nay his Truths should "become any Legall allegations or evidences in "Sane. we may therfore account it unjust that "the fore named miraculory Effect by the Divell "wrought and Imputed by the bewitched, should be "Esteemed an infallible mark against any man "as therfore [crossed out word] convinced a Witch. for [carot] that the Divel and the "bewitched have so decyphered him! Thus that learn= ed man. But to the case in hand I have se= verall things to offer. 1 It is possible that the persons [in Question may be possessed with a Caco daemon. That bewitched per sons are really many times possessed with Evil Spirits is most certain. And as Mr _Perkins_ ob= serves, no man can prove but that witchcraft might