.NDI.MjIzMjY: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Form of innocent persons out of those convotrians & that (ther? - illegible) is no question to God made of it,  but (crossed out illegible) as to his natural pon r and art he is able to make their shapes appear among his Servant, but no supposeth ho providence of God will not suffer such an injury to be done to an innocent person 10th him (m) Delrio and S(illegible) con cure Cumanmy in his Lucorna Inquisitorium (a book I have not yet seen) defends the affirmative of this Question. Binsfieldins(? and something crossed out) in his treatise concerning the confession of witches inclines to tho negative: only (o) he acknowlodges that Dei extraordinaria permissione posse (niocontes?) sic representari. And hee that shall assert that the great and holy God never did nor ever will permitt the Divel (this?) far to abuse an inocent person, affirms more then he is able to prove. The story of Germanus his discovering of a Diabolicall illusion of this nature concerning a great number of persons that seemed to be at a feast when they were really at home & (a sheep?) is mentioned by many authors. But the Particulars insisted on (illeg) Sufficiently (illeg) the truth of what (illeg). that the Divel may by Divine permission appear in the shape of (crossed out illegible) inocent and pious persons.
Form of innocent persons out of those conventions
& that ther is no question to bee made of it,  but  
(crossed out illegible) ^ [as to] his natural pow^r and art he is able to make their  
[crossed out word: power] shapes appear among his Servants, but he
^(L) supposeth the providence of God will not suffer such  
an injury to be done to an inocent person w^th
him (m) Delrio [underlined] , and Spin [underlined][crossed out letter e]us concur:  Cumancy [underlined] in  
his Lucerna Inquisitorium [underlined] (a book I have not yet  
seen) defends the affirmative of this Question.  
Insfielding [underlined] [crossed out citation] in his treatise concerning the con=
fession of witches inclines to the negative: only (o)  
he acknowledges that Dei extraordinaria permis=
sione posse niocentes ^sic representari. [underlined] And ^hee that  
shall assert that the great and holy God nev^r did nor  
ever will permitt the Divel thus far to abuse  
an inocent person, affirms more than he is able  
to prove. The story of Germanus [underlined] his discovering  
of a Diabolicall illusion of this nature concern
ing a great number of persons that seemed to be  
at a feast when they were really at home & a=
sleep is mentioned by many authors. But the  
Particulars insisted on he Sufficiently evinced
the truth of what wee assert viz. that the Divel  
may by Divine permission appear in the shape  
of [crossed out illegible] inocent and [crossed out letter] pious persons. Never the less,
tis evident from another Scripture viz that in
the 2 Cor. 11. 14 ^  [underlined: [for Satan Himselfe is transformed into an Angell of Light].] Hee seems to be what he is not
 
(l) In bi
supra
Cap. 13
(m) disq.
magis
L.C.12
(o)de confess.
Sagaxum
p 191

Latest revision as of 15:24, 20 July 2017

Form of innocent persons out of those conventions & that ther is no question to bee made of it, but (crossed out illegible) ^ [as to] his natural pow^r and art he is able to make their [crossed out word: power] shapes appear among his Servants, but he ^(L) supposeth the providence of God will not suffer such an injury to be done to an inocent person w^th him (m) Delrio [underlined] , and Spin [underlined][crossed out letter e]us concur: Cumancy [underlined] in his Lucerna Inquisitorium [underlined] (a book I have not yet seen) defends the affirmative of this Question. Insfielding [underlined] [crossed out citation] in his treatise concerning the con= fession of witches inclines to the negative: only (o) he acknowledges that Dei extraordinaria permis= sione posse niocentes ^sic representari. [underlined] And ^hee that shall assert that the great and holy God nev^r did nor ever will permitt the Divel thus far to abuse an inocent person, affirms more than he is able to prove. The story of Germanus [underlined] his discovering of a Diabolicall illusion of this nature concern ing a great number of persons that seemed to be at a feast when they were really at home & a= sleep is mentioned by many authors. But the Particulars insisted on he Sufficiently evinced the truth of what wee assert viz. that the Divel may by Divine permission appear in the shape of [crossed out illegible] inocent and [crossed out letter] pious persons. Never the less, tis evident from another Scripture viz that in the 2 Cor. 11. 14 ^ [underlined: [for Satan Himselfe is transformed into an Angell of Light].] Hee seems to be what he is not

(l) In bi supra Cap. 13 (m) disq. magis L.C.12 (o)de confess. Sagaxum p 191