.NDI.MjIzMjY: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Form of innocent persons out of those | Form of innocent persons out of those conventions | ||
& that ther is no question to bee made of it, but | |||
(crossed out illegible) ^ [as to] his natural pow^r and art he is able to make their | |||
[crossed out word: power] shapes appear among his Servants, but he | |||
^(L) supposeth the providence of God will not suffer such | |||
an injury to be done to an inocent person w^th | |||
him (m) Delrio [underlined] , and Spin [underlined][crossed out letter e]us concur: Cumancy [underlined] in | |||
his Lucerna Inquisitorium [underlined] (a book I have not yet | |||
seen) defends the affirmative of this Question. | |||
Insfielding [underlined] [crossed out citation] in his treatise concerning the con= | |||
fession of witches inclines to the negative: only (o) | |||
he acknowledges that Dei extraordinaria permis= | |||
sione posse niocentes ^sic representari. [underlined] And ^hee that | |||
shall assert that the great and holy God nev^r did nor | |||
ever will permitt the Divel thus far to abuse | |||
an inocent person, affirms more than he is able | |||
to prove. The story of Germanus [underlined] his discovering | |||
of a Diabolicall illusion of this nature concern | |||
ing a great number of persons that seemed to be | |||
at a feast when they were really at home & a= | |||
sleep is mentioned by many authors. But the | |||
Particulars insisted on he Sufficiently evinced | |||
the truth of what wee assert viz. that the Divel | |||
may by Divine permission appear in the shape | |||
of [crossed out illegible] inocent and [crossed out letter] pious persons. Never the less, | |||
tis evident from another Scripture viz that in | |||
the 2 Cor. 11. 14 ^ [underlined: [for Satan Himselfe is transformed into an Angell of Light].] Hee seems to be what he is not | |||
(l) In bi | |||
supra | |||
Cap. 13 | |||
(m) disq. | |||
magis | |||
L.C.12 | |||
(o)de confess. | |||
Sagaxum | |||
p 191 |
Latest revision as of 15:24, 20 July 2017
Form of innocent persons out of those conventions & that ther is no question to bee made of it, but (crossed out illegible) ^ [as to] his natural pow^r and art he is able to make their [crossed out word: power] shapes appear among his Servants, but he ^(L) supposeth the providence of God will not suffer such an injury to be done to an inocent person w^th him (m) Delrio [underlined] , and Spin [underlined][crossed out letter e]us concur: Cumancy [underlined] in his Lucerna Inquisitorium [underlined] (a book I have not yet seen) defends the affirmative of this Question. Insfielding [underlined] [crossed out citation] in his treatise concerning the con= fession of witches inclines to the negative: only (o) he acknowledges that Dei extraordinaria permis= sione posse niocentes ^sic representari. [underlined] And ^hee that shall assert that the great and holy God nev^r did nor ever will permitt the Divel thus far to abuse an inocent person, affirms more than he is able to prove. The story of Germanus [underlined] his discovering of a Diabolicall illusion of this nature concern ing a great number of persons that seemed to be at a feast when they were really at home & a= sleep is mentioned by many authors. But the Particulars insisted on he Sufficiently evinced the truth of what wee assert viz. that the Divel may by Divine permission appear in the shape of [crossed out illegible] inocent and [crossed out letter] pious persons. Never the less, tis evident from another Scripture viz that in the 2 Cor. 11. 14 ^ [underlined: [for Satan Himselfe is transformed into an Angell of Light].] Hee seems to be what he is not
(l) In bi supra Cap. 13 (m) disq. magis L.C.12 (o)de confess. Sagaxum p 191