.NDI.MjIzMjM: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Some of the Jewish Rabbies (a) & some Chrisan  
Some of the Jewish Rabbies (a) & some Chrisan  
Doctors (b) and many Late Popish (c) authors amongst  
Doctors (b) and many Late Popish (c) Authors amongst
whom _Corn-a-Lapide (d) is most Elaborate. but that  
whom [underlined: Corn.a.Lapide] (d) is most Elaborate. but that  
it was a [underlined] Demon [underlined] representing Samuel hath been  
it was a [underlined: Demon] representing Samuel hath been  
Evinced by Learned and Orthodox Writers Especially by _Peter Martyr_, (f) _Balduinus_, ([crossed out letter]) _Lavater_, & our in=
Evinced by Learned and Orthodox Writers Especialy
comparable (g) _John Rainold_. I shall not here insist on
by [underlined: Peter Martyr], (f) [underlined: Balduinus] ([crossed out letter]) [underlined: Lavater], & our in=
hearing of that, Especially considering that (h) elsewhere  
comparable [underlined: Jo[^(g)]hn Rainold]. I shall not here insist on
I have done it. Only lett me now add that ye witch  
bearing of that, Especially considering that [^(h)] elsewhere  
said to Saul I [word crossed out] see [underlined] Elohim.[underlined] (i.e) [underlined]a God[underlined] (for the whole  
I have done it. Only lett me now add that y[^e] witch  
Context shews that a Single person is intended) [underlined] ascend=
said to Saul I [word crossed out] see [underlined: Elohim](i.e) [underlined: a God] (for the whole  
ing out of the Earth [underlined]; 1 Sam^ll [illegible] 13. the Divel would  
Context shɘws that a Singlɘ person is intɘnded) [underlined: ascɘnd=
be worshipped as a God and Saul now that ^hee was become
=ing out of thɘ Earth]; 1 Sam. [^ll][ 28 13. the Divel would  
a [underlined] Necromancer [underlined] must bow to him. Moreover, had  
be worshipped as a God and Saul now that [^hee] was bɘcome
it been the true Samuel from Heaven Reprehend=
a [underlined: Necromancer] must bow to him. Moreover, had  
ing Saul, thers great reason to think that he would  
it been thɘ true Samuel from Heaven Reprehend
ing Saul, thɘrs great reason to think that would  
not only have reproved him for his sin in not exe=
not only have reproved him for his sin in not exe=
cuting judgem^t on the Amalekites as in vs. 18. but  
cuting judgem[^t] on the Amalɘkites as in ys. 18. but  
for his wickedness in Consulting w^th familiar Spirits; for  
for his wickedness in Consulting w[^th] familiar Spirits; for  
which Sin it was in Speciall that he dyed Chron.10.15  
which Sin it was in Speciall that dyed [crossed letter] Chron.10.15  
but in as much as ther is not one word to testifie ag^st  
but in as much as thɘr is not one word to testifie ag[^[underlined: st]]
that abomination wee may conclude that twas  
that abomination wee may conclude that twas  
not real Sam^el that appeard to Saul. and if it were  
not real Sam[^el] that appeard to Saul. and if it were  
the Divel in his likeness the argument seems very
the Divel in his likeness thɘ argument seems very
  strong, that if the Divel may appear in the forme of  
  strong, that if thɘ Divel may appear in thɘ forme of  
a Saint in glory much more is it possible for him to  
a Saint in glory much more is it possiblɘ for him to  
put on the likness of the most pious & inocent saint on
put on thɘ likness of the most pious & inocɘnt saint on


[Notes in the margins]:
[Notes in the margins]:


(a) R. Saadia, R. Eleazar, R: Athias, Lyrzanus, Sic & Joseph
(a) R. Saadia,  
(b) Ambrose & Hierom Basil, Nazianzen.
R. Elearar, R: Athias,  
(c) Thom[a]s, Tostatus, Suarez, Cajetan.
Eyrzanun, Sic & Josep [superscript: letter]
(d) In Ecclesiastic. cap. 46 vs. 23.  
(b) Ambrose & Hierom  
(f) In 2 Cor. 11 p. 555
Basil,[below the line g] Nazianzen
(g) In libr. Apocryph.
(c) Thom[a]s, sertatus,  
(h) Remark. provid. p. 211
Suarez, Cajetan.
(d) In [Ecclesi-
astic?]. cap. 46  
vs. 23.  
(f) In 2 Cor.  
11. p. 555
(g) dr like.  
Apocryph.
(h) Remark.  
provid. p. 211

Latest revision as of 09:36, 30 November 2017

Some of the Jewish Rabbies (a) & some Chrisan 

Doctors (b) and many Late Popish (c) Authors amongst

whom [underlined: Corn.a.Lapide] (d) is most Elaborate. but that 

it was a [underlined: Demon] representing Samuel hath been Evinced by Learned and Orthodox Writers Especialy

by [underlined: Peter Martyr], (f) [underlined: Balduinus] ([crossed out letter]) [underlined: Lavater], & our in=

comparable [underlined: Jo[^(g)]hn Rainold]. I shall not here insist on bearing of that, Especially considering that [^(h)] elsewhere I have done it. Only lett me now add that y[^e] witch said to Saul I [word crossed out] see [underlined: Elohim](i.e) [underlined: a God] (for the whole Context shɘws that a Singlɘ person is intɘnded) [underlined: ascɘnd= =ing out of thɘ Earth]; 1 Sam. [^ll][ 28 13. the Divel would be worshipped as a God and Saul now that [^hee] was bɘcome a [underlined: Necromancer] must bow to him. Moreover, had it been thɘ true Samuel from Heaven Reprehend ing Saul, thɘrs great reason to think that hɘ would not only have reproved him for his sin in not exe= cuting judgem[^t] on the Amalɘkites as in ys. 18. but for his wickedness in Consulting w[^th] familiar Spirits; for which Sin it was in Speciall that hɘ dyed [crossed letter] Chron.10.15 but in as much as thɘr is not one word to testifie ag[^[underlined: st]] that abomination wee may conclude that twas not real Sam[^el] that appeard to Saul. and if it were the Divel in his likeness thɘ argument seems very

strong, that if thɘ Divel may appear in thɘ forme of 

a Saint in glory much more is it possiblɘ for him to put on thɘ likness of the most pious & inocɘnt saint on

[Notes in the margins]:

(a) R. Saadia, R. Elearar, R: Athias, Eyrzanun, Sic & Josep [superscript: letter] (b) Ambrose & Hierom Basil,[below the line g] Nazianzen (c) Thom[a]s, sertatus, Suarez, Cajetan. (d) In [Ecclesi- astic?]. cap. 46 vs. 23. (f) In 2 Cor. 11. p. 555 (g) dr like. Apocryph. (h) Remark. provid. p. 211