.NDI.MjIzMjM: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Some of the Jewish Rabbies (a) & some Christian Doctors (b) and many [?] Sopish (c) authors amongst whom [corn-a-Lapide?] is most Elaborate but that it was a Demon representing Samuel hath been Evinced by Learned and Orthodox Writers Especially by Peter Martyr (†) [baldouines?] [Lavater?] & our incomparable John [Rainold?]. I shall not more insist on hearing of that, Especially considering that (h) elsewhere I have done it. Only lett me now add that if witch said to Saul [word crossed out - Jesus?] see Elohim. (i.e) a God for the [whols?]ing out of the Earth; Sam [illegible] 13. the Divel would be worshipped as a God and Saul now that hee was become a necromancer must bow to him. Moreover, had it been [this?] [true?] Samuel from Heaven [Reprehending?] Saul, [this?] great reason to think that he would not only have reproved him for his sin in not [cocecuating?] judgement on [illegible] as in fg. 18. but for his wickedness in Consulting with familiar Spirits, for which Sin it was in Speciall that this dyed Chron.10.15 but in as much as [illegible] is not one word to [testifie agst?] that abomination wee may conclude that [illegible] not real Sam that appeard to Saul. and if it were the Divel in his likeness [illegible] argument seems very strong, that if the Divel may appear in the forme of a Saint in glory much more is it possible for him to put on the likeness of [that?] most pious [inocent?] saint on
Some of the Jewish Rabbies (a) & some Chrisan
Doctors (b) and many Late Popish (c) Authors amongst
whom [underlined: Corn.a.Lapide] (d) is most Elaborate. but that  
it was a [underlined: Demon] representing Samuel hath been  
Evinced by Learned and Orthodox Writers Especialy
by [underlined: Peter Martyr], (f) [underlined: Balduinus] ([crossed out letter]) [underlined: Lavater], & our in=
comparable [underlined: Jo[^(g)]hn Rainold]. I shall not here insist on
bearing of that, Especially considering that [^(h)] elsewhere  
I have done it. Only lett me now add that y[^e] witch  
said to Saul I [word crossed out] see [underlined: Elohim](i.e) [underlined: a God] (for the whole
Context shɘws that a Singlɘ person is intɘnded) [underlined: ascɘnd=
=ing out of thɘ Earth]; 1 Sam. [^ll][ 28 13. the Divel would  
be worshipped as a God and Saul now that [^hee] was bɘcome
a [underlined: Necromancer] must bow to him. Moreover, had  
it been thɘ true Samuel from Heaven Reprehend
ing Saul, thɘrs great reason to think that hɘ would  
not only have reproved him for his sin in not exe=
cuting judgem[^t] on the Amalɘkites as in ys. 18. but  
for his wickedness in Consulting w[^th] familiar Spirits; for  
which Sin it was in Speciall that hɘ dyed [crossed letter] Chron.10.15  
but in as much as thɘr is not one word to testifie ag[^[underlined: st]]  
that abomination wee may conclude that twas
not real Sam[^el] that appeard to Saul. and if it were  
the Divel in his likeness thɘ argument seems very
strong, that if thɘ Divel may appear in thɘ forme of  
a Saint in glory much more is it possiblɘ for him to  
put on thɘ likness of the most pious & inocɘnt saint on
 
[Notes in the margins]:
 
(a) R. Saadia,
R. Elearar, R: Athias,
Eyrzanun, Sic & Josep [superscript: letter]
(b) Ambrose & Hierom
Basil,[below the line g] Nazianzen
(c) Thom[a]s, sertatus,
Suarez, Cajetan.
(d) In [Ecclesi-
astic?]. cap. 46
vs. 23.
(f) In 2 Cor.
11. p. 555
(g) dr like.
Apocryph.
(h) Remark.
provid. p. 211

Latest revision as of 09:36, 30 November 2017

Some of the Jewish Rabbies (a) & some Chrisan

Doctors (b) and many Late Popish (c) Authors amongst 

whom [underlined: Corn.a.Lapide] (d) is most Elaborate. but that

it was a [underlined: Demon] representing Samuel hath been Evinced by Learned and Orthodox Writers Especialy 

by [underlined: Peter Martyr], (f) [underlined: Balduinus] ([crossed out letter]) [underlined: Lavater], & our in=

comparable [underlined: Jo[^(g)]hn Rainold]. I shall not here insist on bearing of that, Especially considering that [^(h)] elsewhere I have done it. Only lett me now add that y[^e] witch said to Saul I [word crossed out] see [underlined: Elohim](i.e) [underlined: a God] (for the whole Context shɘws that a Singlɘ person is intɘnded) [underlined: ascɘnd= =ing out of thɘ Earth]; 1 Sam. [^ll][ 28 13. the Divel would be worshipped as a God and Saul now that [^hee] was bɘcome a [underlined: Necromancer] must bow to him. Moreover, had it been thɘ true Samuel from Heaven Reprehend ing Saul, thɘrs great reason to think that hɘ would not only have reproved him for his sin in not exe= cuting judgem[^t] on the Amalɘkites as in ys. 18. but for his wickedness in Consulting w[^th] familiar Spirits; for which Sin it was in Speciall that hɘ dyed [crossed letter] Chron.10.15 but in as much as thɘr is not one word to testifie ag[^[underlined: st]] that abomination wee may conclude that twas not real Sam[^el] that appeard to Saul. and if it were the Divel in his likeness thɘ argument seems very 

strong, that if thɘ Divel may appear in thɘ forme of

a Saint in glory much more is it possiblɘ for him to put on thɘ likness of the most pious & inocɘnt saint on

[Notes in the margins]:

(a) R. Saadia, R. Elearar, R: Athias, Eyrzanun, Sic & Josep [superscript: letter] (b) Ambrose & Hierom Basil,[below the line g] Nazianzen (c) Thom[a]s, sertatus, Suarez, Cajetan. (d) In [Ecclesi- astic?]. cap. 46 vs. 23. (f) In 2 Cor. 11. p. 555 (g) dr like. Apocryph. (h) Remark. provid. p. 211

Retrieved from "https://digital.newberry.org/transcribe/wiki/index.php?title=.NDI.MjIzMjM&oldid=4056"