.NDI.MjIzMjM: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 09:36, 30 November 2017

Some of the Jewish Rabbies (a) & some Chrisan

Doctors (b) and many Late Popish (c) Authors amongst

whom [underlined: Corn.a.Lapide] (d) is most Elaborate. but that

it was a [underlined: Demon] representing Samuel hath been Evinced by Learned and Orthodox Writers Especialy

by [underlined: Peter Martyr], (f) [underlined: Balduinus] ([crossed out letter]) [underlined: Lavater], & our in=

comparable [underlined: Jo[^(g)]hn Rainold]. I shall not here insist on bearing of that, Especially considering that [^(h)] elsewhere I have done it. Only lett me now add that y[^e] witch said to Saul I [word crossed out] see [underlined: Elohim](i.e) [underlined: a God] (for the whole Context shɘws that a Singlɘ person is intɘnded) [underlined: ascɘnd= =ing out of thɘ Earth]; 1 Sam. [^ll][ 28 13. the Divel would be worshipped as a God and Saul now that [^hee] was bɘcome a [underlined: Necromancer] must bow to him. Moreover, had it been thɘ true Samuel from Heaven Reprehend ing Saul, thɘrs great reason to think that hɘ would not only have reproved him for his sin in not exe= cuting judgem[^t] on the Amalɘkites as in ys. 18. but for his wickedness in Consulting w[^th] familiar Spirits; for which Sin it was in Speciall that hɘ dyed [crossed letter] Chron.10.15 but in as much as thɘr is not one word to testifie ag[^[underlined: st]] that abomination wee may conclude that twas not real Sam[^el] that appeard to Saul. and if it were the Divel in his likeness thɘ argument seems very

strong, that if thɘ Divel may appear in thɘ forme of

a Saint in glory much more is it possiblɘ for him to put on thɘ likness of the most pious & inocɘnt saint on

[Notes in the margins]:

(a) R. Saadia, R. Elearar, R: Athias, Eyrzanun, Sic & Josep [superscript: letter] (b) Ambrose & Hierom Basil,[below the line g] Nazianzen (c) Thom[a]s, sertatus, Suarez, Cajetan. (d) In [Ecclesi- astic?]. cap. 46 vs. 23. (f) In 2 Cor. 11. p. 555 (g) dr like. Apocryph. (h) Remark. provid. p. 211

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Some of the Jewish Rabbies (a) & some Christian Doctors (b) and many late Popish (c) authors amongst whom [corn-a-Lapide?] is most Elaborate. but that it was a Demon [underlined] representing Samuel hath been Evinced by Learned and Orthodox Writers Especially by Peter Martyr (†) Balduinius Lavater [underlined] & our incomparable Jo^(g)hn Rainold. I shall not more insist on warning of that, Especially considering that ^(h) elsewhere I have done it. Only lett me now add that ye witch said to Saul [word crossed out - Jesus?] see Elohim [underlined]. (i.e.) a God [underlined] for the whole Contest shows that a Single person is intended ascending out of the Earth [underlined]; 1 Sam^ll. [scored out] 13. The Divel would be worshiped as a God and Saul now that ^hee was become a necromancer [underlined] must bow to him. Moreover, had it been the true Samuel from Heaven Reprehending Saul, [illegible - thou? there?] great reasaon to think that he would not only have reproved him for his sin in not executing Judgem^t on the Amalokites as in ps 18. but for his wickedness in Consulting w^th familiar Spirits; for which in it was in Speciall that he dyed Chron.so.18 but in as much as there is not one word to testifie ag^st that abomination wee may conclude that twas not real Sam^ll that appeard to Saul and if it were the Divel in his Likeness the argument seems very Strong, that if the Divel may appear in the forme of a Saint in glory much more is it possible for him to put on the Likness of the most pious & inocent Saint on
+ Some of the Jewish Rabbies (a) & some Chrisan
+Doctors (b) and many Late Popish (c) Authors amongst
+ whom [underlined: Corn.a.Lapide] (d) is most Elaborate. but that
+it was a [underlined: Demon] representing Samuel hath been
+Evinced by Learned and Orthodox Writers Especialy
+ by [underlined: Peter Martyr], (f) [underlined: Balduinus] ([crossed out letter]) [underlined: Lavater], & our in=
+comparable [underlined: Jo[^(g)]hn Rainold]. I shall not here insist on
+bearing of that, Especially considering that [^(h)] elsewhere
+I have done it. Only lett me now add that y[^e] witch
+said to Saul I [word crossed out] see [underlined: Elohim](i.e) [underlined: a God] (for the whole
+Context shɘws that a Singlɘ person is intɘnded) [underlined: ascɘnd=
+=ing out of thɘ Earth]; 1 Sam. [^ll][ 28 13. the Divel would
+be worshipped as a God and Saul now that [^hee] was bɘcome
+a [underlined: Necromancer] must bow to him. Moreover, had
+it been thɘ true Samuel from Heaven Reprehend
+ing Saul, thɘrs great reason to think that hɘ would
+not only have reproved him for his sin in not exe=
+cuting judgem[^t] on the Amalɘkites as in ys. 18. but
+for his wickedness in Consulting w[^th] familiar Spirits; for
+which Sin it was in Speciall that hɘ dyed [crossed letter] Chron.10.15
+but in as much as thɘr is not one word to testifie ag[^[underlined: st]]
+that abomination wee may conclude that twas
+not real Sam[^el] that appeard to Saul. and if it were
+the Divel in his likeness thɘ argument seems very
+ strong, that if thɘ Divel may appear in thɘ forme of
+a Saint in glory much more is it possiblɘ for him to
+put on thɘ likness of the most pious & inocɘnt saint on
-[in margin - guessing these are prophet names]
+[Notes in the margins]:
-(a) Kaldias [?] the Eloarary [illegible] Eyrzamunsick Jose^sp
-b) Ambros[?] Hieron Basienazianzer
+(a) R. Saadia,
+R. Elearar, R: Athias,
-c) Thom^s [crossed out] Setatry [?]
+Eyrzanun, Sic & Josep [superscript: letter]
-hoares plajetan. [Latin?]
+(b) Ambrose & Hierom
+Basil,[below the line g] Nazianzen
-(d) In 2 whiss apic. cap. 46. pg. 23.
+(c) Thom[a]s, sertatus,
+Suarez, Cajetan.
-(e) in 2 cor. 11. p. 555
+(d) In [Ecclesi-
+astic?]. cap. 46
-(g) In like Apocalypse [?]
+vs. 23.
+(f) In 2 Cor.
-(k) Remark.parr'd. p. 211
+. p. 555
+(g) dr like.
+Apocryph.
+(h) Remark.
+provid. p. 211

.NDI.MjIzMjM: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 09:36, 30 November 2017

Navigation menu