.NDI.MjIzMjI: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[upper right corner: 1]
The first Case [underlined] which I am desired to expres
The first Case [underlined] which I am desired to expres
my judgmen^t in, is this, [underlined: Whether it is not  
my judgemt [superscript: t] in, is this, [underlining: (beginning at) Whether (ending with) molestations?] [different handwriting] Whether it is not  
possible for the Divel to impose on the im
possible for the Divel to impose on the im
[crossed out: m]aginations of persons bewitched and  
[crossed out: m]aginations of persons bewitched and  
to cause them to beleive y°t an Inocent, yea
to cause them to beleive if [superscript: t] an Inocent, yea
that a pious person does torment them =  
that a pious person does torment them =  
when y^e Div^l himself doth it, or whether  
when y [superscript: e] Div [superscript: l] himself doth it, or whether  
Satan may not appear in the shape of a  
Satan may not appear in the Shape of a  
pious & Inocent as well as in the shape of a  
pious & Inocent as well as in the Shape of a  
nocent & wicked person to afflict such as  
nocent & wicked person to afflict such as  
suffer - by Diabolical molestations?]
suffer by Diabolical molestations?
The [underlined: Answer] to the Question must be [underlined: Affirma
[resume previous handwriting] The [underlined: Answer] to the Question must be [underlined: Affirma
tive]. Let the following Arguments bee duely=
tive]. Let the following Arguments bee duely=
weighed in the Ballance of the Sanctuary.  
weighed in the Ballance of the Sanctuary.  
Argum. 1. Ther are Severall Scriptures
Argum. 1. Ther are Severall Scriptures
from which wee may infer the possibility of  
from which wee may infer the possibility of  
what is affirmed. 1. Wee find [underlined: that the Divel  
what is affirmed. [large space] 1 Wee find [underlined: that the Divel  
by the instigation of the witch at Endor ap=
by the instigation of the witch at Endor ap=
=peard in the Likeness of the Prophet Samuel].  
=peard in the Likeness of the Prophet Samuel].  
I am not Ignorant that some have offered that  
I am not Ignorant that some have offered that  
which if it were proved would evert this ar=
which if it were proved would evert this ar=
gum^t viz: that it was the true and not [crossed out: the] a de=
gum [superscript: t] viz: that it was the true and not [crossed out: the] a de=
lusive Samuel which the witch brought to  
lusive Samuel which the witch brought to  
converse with Saul. Of this Opinion are
converse with Saul. Ofthis Opinion are

Latest revision as of 09:44, 30 November 2017

[upper right corner: 1] The first Case [underlined] which I am desired to expres my judgemt [superscript: t] in, is this, [underlining: (beginning at) Whether (ending with) molestations?] [different handwriting] Whether it is not possible for the Divel to impose on the im [crossed out: m]aginations of persons bewitched and to cause them to beleive if [superscript: t] an Inocent, yea that a pious person does torment them = when y [superscript: e] Div [superscript: l] himself doth it, or whether Satan may not appear in the Shape of a pious & Inocent as well as in the Shape of a nocent & wicked person to afflict such as suffer by Diabolical molestations? [resume previous handwriting] The [underlined: Answer] to the Question must be [underlined: Affirma tive]. Let the following Arguments bee duely= weighed in the Ballance of the Sanctuary. Argum. 1. Ther are Severall Scriptures from which wee may infer the possibility of what is affirmed. [large space] 1 Wee find [underlined: that the Divel by the instigation of the witch at Endor ap= =peard in the Likeness of the Prophet Samuel]. I am not Ignorant that some have offered that which if it were proved would evert this ar= gum [superscript: t] viz: that it was the true and not [crossed out: the] a de= lusive Samuel which the witch brought to converse with Saul. Ofthis Opinion are