.MTA2NA.NzIyMjE: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Kitsapian
No edit summary
imported>Kitsapian
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[top left margin headnote:  obligations to individuals - first branch - commission under the 17th article]]  collusion on the part of the commission  
[[top left margin headnote:  obligations to individuals - first branch - commission under the 17th article]]  collusion on the part of the commission  
with certain attornies, who could covertly
with certain attornies, who could covertly carry any demand, in the name of any Cherokee, even though before rejected by the same commission; and that attornies so favoured realized immense profits from this partiality, and often pocketed for themselves, what they had recovered in the name of the Indians7th: That other attornies, more honest and disinterested, but not in favor with the commissioners, could not obtain attention to any claim for the Indians, no matter how clearly just.   It has been asked, supposing all these imputations to be deserved, what is the use of complaining about them now? The treaty made the decisions of the Commission final. No right survives to look into its proceedings. If they have been wrong, there can be no remedy. To this it may be answered, a  vast number of Cherokees yet remain unpaid. Their claims are still good against the United States. It has been asserted that in North Carolina and its vicinity these have been estimated even yet  to exceed a million; and these are not all. None of them can be adjudicated, so says the seventeenth article, excepting under a revival of the Commission there
carry any demand, in the name of any
Cherokee, even though before rejected by the  
same commission, and that attornies so
favoured realized immense profits from  
this partiality, and often pocketed for themselves,  
what they had recovered in the name
of the Indians
7th: That other attornies, more  
honest and disinterested, but not in favor
with the commissioners, could not obtain  
attention to any claim for the Indians, no
matter how clearly just.  
It has been asked, supposing all
these [[unclear]] to be deserved, what is  
the use of complaining about them now?
The treaty made the decisions of the  
Commission final. No right survives to look
into its proceedings. If they have been wrong,
there can be no remedy.
To this it may be answered, a
  vast number of Cherokees yet remain  
unpaid. Their claims are still good against the  
United States. It has been asserted that in  
North Carolina and it's vicinity these have  
been estimated even yet  to exceed a million;  
and these are not all. None of them can be
adjudicated, so says the seventeenth article,  
excepting under a revival of the Commission
there

Latest revision as of 17:18, 12 July 2020

top left margin headnote: obligations to individuals - first branch - commission under the 17th article collusion on the part of the commission with certain attornies, who could covertly carry any demand, in the name of any Cherokee, even though before rejected by the same commission; and that attornies so favoured realized immense profits from this partiality, and often pocketed for themselves, what they had recovered in the name of the Indians. 7th: That other attornies, more honest and disinterested, but not in favor with the commissioners, could not obtain attention to any claim for the Indians, no matter how clearly just. It has been asked, supposing all these imputations to be deserved, what is the use of complaining about them now? The treaty made the decisions of the Commission final. No right survives to look into its proceedings. If they have been wrong, there can be no remedy. To this it may be answered, a vast number of Cherokees yet remain unpaid. Their claims are still good against the United States. It has been asserted that in North Carolina and its vicinity these have been estimated even yet to exceed a million; and these are not all. None of them can be adjudicated, so says the seventeenth article, excepting under a revival of the Commission there