.MTA2NA.NzIyMjA: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Kitsapian
No edit summary
imported>Kitsapian
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[top right margin headnote:  obligations to individuals - first branch - commission under the 17th article]]  entirely, and sometimes partly, denied payment,
[[top right margin headnote:  obligations to individuals - first branch - commission under the 17th article]]  entirely, and sometimes partly, denied payment, under these various heads, in the face of the clearest evidence that their statements were indisputable. 3d. That against Cherokees who were not favoured, debts were unjustly permitted to be proven by those who were, and that thus such wronged Cherokees were still further wronged. 4th. That, in certain cases, although the first clause of the ninth section of the Treaty promises "a just and fair valuation of all improvements," the Commission refused even to make such valuation, under the pretense of not having funds in hand to pay for them. 5th. That, in other cases, valuations of very extensive improvements were made without any consultation with the owners, and debts permitted to be proven against them, both manifestly unfair, and that, instances occurred where the owners of improvements thus under-rated, being under duress, although they from necessity took the balance awarded after the deduction from of unjust claims for pretended debt, felt if due to themselves and their families and their country to accompany the reception with a protest. 6th. That there was gross collusion
under these various heads, in the face of the
clearest evidence that their statements indisputable.
3d. That against Cherokees
who were not favoured, debts were unjustly  
permitted to be proven by those who were,
and that thus such wronged Cherokees were
still further wronged.
4th. That, in certain cases,  
although the first clause of the ninth section of
the Treaty promises "a just and fair valuation
of all improvements," the Commission refused
even to make such valuation,  
under the pretense of not having funds in hand
to pay for them.
5th. That, in other cases,
valuations of very extensive improvements
were made without any consultation with
the owners, and debts permitted to be proven
against them, both manifestly unfair, and
that, instances occurred where the owners of
improvements thus under-rated, being under
duress, although they from necessity took the
balance awarded after the deduction from
of unjust claims for pretended debt,
felt if due to themselves and their families
and their country to accompany the reception
with a protest.  
6th. That there was gross  
collusion

Latest revision as of 17:12, 12 July 2020

top right margin headnote: obligations to individuals - first branch - commission under the 17th article entirely, and sometimes partly, denied payment, under these various heads, in the face of the clearest evidence that their statements were indisputable. 3d. That against Cherokees who were not favoured, debts were unjustly permitted to be proven by those who were, and that thus such wronged Cherokees were still further wronged. 4th. That, in certain cases, although the first clause of the ninth section of the Treaty promises "a just and fair valuation of all improvements," the Commission refused even to make such valuation, under the pretense of not having funds in hand to pay for them. 5th. That, in other cases, valuations of very extensive improvements were made without any consultation with the owners, and debts permitted to be proven against them, both manifestly unfair, and that, instances occurred where the owners of improvements thus under-rated, being under duress, although they from necessity took the balance awarded after the deduction from of unjust claims for pretended debt, felt if due to themselves and their families and their country to accompany the reception with a protest. 6th. That there was gross collusion