.MTA2MA.NzE2NjI: Difference between revisions
imported>P1umtree (Created page with "because the existing authorities, or the "powers that be" as far as we are concerned until, by some blurred higher tribunal, they are determined not to blurred be such...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
because the existing authorities, or the "powers that be" as far as we are concerned until, by some [[blurred]] higher tribunal, they are determined not to [[blurred]] be such; and we are bound to obey them [[blurred]] accordingly. It is not for us to enquire into the justice of this change of houses, or the right of | because the existing authorities, or the "powers that be" as far as we are concerned until, by some [[blurred]] higher tribunal, they are determined not to [[blurred]] be such; and we are bound to obey them [[blurred]] accordingly. It is not for us to enquire into the justice of this change of houses, or the right of rulers to govern. The remarks of Locke & Dr. Scott are to this effect. (Rom. 13 Ch.) "Whether we take powers here, in the abstract, for political authority, or in the concrete for the persons actually exercising political power & jurisdiction, the sense will be the same. How men come by a rightful title to this power, or who has this title, the apostle is wholly silent, and says nothing of. To have meddled with that would have been to divide of civil rights, contrary to the design and business of the gospel, and the example of our saviour; who refused meddling in such cases with this decisive question, "Who made me a judge - or a divider over you" (Locke) | ||
"The words rendered "the powers that be" or "the existing authorities" seem intended to exclude all such enquiries. Whatever the form of the existing government, or the way by which it is established, which it continues to exist, it must be regarded and submitted to as the appointment of Providence. Perhaps nothing involves greater difficulties, in very many instances, than to ascertain to whom within individually or collectively, the authority justly belongs, or in fact what constitutes a lawful title to authority, If then, the most learned and intelligent men, find many difficulties, and differ widely in their opinions respecting | |||
Latest revision as of 16:23, 26 January 2022
because the existing authorities, or the "powers that be" as far as we are concerned until, by some blurred higher tribunal, they are determined not to blurred be such; and we are bound to obey them blurred accordingly. It is not for us to enquire into the justice of this change of houses, or the right of rulers to govern. The remarks of Locke & Dr. Scott are to this effect. (Rom. 13 Ch.) "Whether we take powers here, in the abstract, for political authority, or in the concrete for the persons actually exercising political power & jurisdiction, the sense will be the same. How men come by a rightful title to this power, or who has this title, the apostle is wholly silent, and says nothing of. To have meddled with that would have been to divide of civil rights, contrary to the design and business of the gospel, and the example of our saviour; who refused meddling in such cases with this decisive question, "Who made me a judge - or a divider over you" (Locke) "The words rendered "the powers that be" or "the existing authorities" seem intended to exclude all such enquiries. Whatever the form of the existing government, or the way by which it is established, which it continues to exist, it must be regarded and submitted to as the appointment of Providence. Perhaps nothing involves greater difficulties, in very many instances, than to ascertain to whom within individually or collectively, the authority justly belongs, or in fact what constitutes a lawful title to authority, If then, the most learned and intelligent men, find many difficulties, and differ widely in their opinions respecting