.MTQz.MzM3MTA: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nansroe98
(Created page with "? was the Son of God, in an infinite= ly bughter sense than Adam. By nature he was God, as to his divinity, & hence, when he ap= peared in flesh, he was the image of the...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[?]] was the Son of God, in an infinite=
Ct [Christ] was the Son of God, in an infinitely higher sense than Adam.  
ly bughter sense than Adam.  
By nature he was God, as to his  
By nature he was God, as to his  
divinity, & hence, when he ap=
divinity, & hence, when he appeared in flesh, he was the image
peared in flesh, he was the image
of the invisible God: To the apos:
of the invisible God: I the [[?]]
who is the brightness of the Father's
who is [[?]] brightness of the Father's
glory & the express image of his  
glory & the [[?]] imahe of his  
person. He bore a higher  
person. He bore a higher  
& more perfect [[cesemblance?]] of  
& more perfect resemblance of  
the invisible Deity than Adam  
the invisible Deity than Adam  
on any angelic order what=
on any angelic order whatever. God the Father never  
ever. God the Father never  
sd to any of the Angels this
[[?[[ to any but he said so, of things [[?]] of the angels this
day have I begotten thee but he said so, of Christ Jesus
day have [[?]] begotten thee
& this the apos, reckons as [[pro.. cut off]] of Cts divinity & union with
& this the [[?]] reckon
the Father above Angels -  But certainly if Adam w [[cut off]] singular in
his formation, none like him, he represen[[ts]] one much more singe[[cut off]]
Even God, manifests in

Latest revision as of 18:43, 12 December 2021

Ct [Christ] was the Son of God, in an infinitely higher sense than Adam. By nature he was God, as to his divinity, & hence, when he appeared in flesh, he was the image of the invisible God: To the apos: who is the brightness of the Father's glory & the express image of his person. He bore a higher & more perfect resemblance of the invisible Deity than Adam on any angelic order whatever. God the Father never sd to any of the Angels this day have I begotten thee but he said so, of Christ Jesus & this the apos, reckons as pro.. cut off of Cts divinity & union with the Father above Angels - But certainly if Adam w cut off singular in his formation, none like him, he represents one much more singecut off Even God, manifests in