.MTQz.MzM3MDY: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Nansroe98 No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Thom 5. 14th - v} Nov. 1800 | |||
Who is the figure of him | |||
Who is the figure of him that was to come | that was to come | ||
The whole verse | The whole verse runs thus, | ||
Nevertheless death | Nevertheless death reigned from | ||
Adam to Moses, even over | Adam to Moses, even over | ||
them that had not sinned after the [[ | them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam[['s]] | ||
transgression - who is the figure of him that was to come - | |||
The words who is the figure | The words who is the figure | ||
refers immediately to Adam | refers immediately to Adam | ||
from whom death had reigned | from whom death had reigned: | ||
to | to the days of Moses- The person of whom Adam was a figure, is Ct.[Christ]; as appears from | ||
the whole series of the apos discourse before and after the text - | |||
This being too plain to be misunderstood the plain affection of | |||
Latest revision as of 18:21, 12 December 2021
Thom 5. 14th - v} Nov. 1800 Who is the figure of him that was to come The whole verse runs thus, Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression - who is the figure of him that was to come - The words who is the figure refers immediately to Adam from whom death had reigned: to the days of Moses- The person of whom Adam was a figure, is Ct.[Christ]; as appears from the whole series of the apos discourse before and after the text - This being too plain to be misunderstood the plain affection of