.MjAz.NDYwMjI: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Linguist808 No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The first without the second, would be unreasoned | The first without the second, would be unreasoned | ||
To undertake to be pious without being just | To undertake to be pious without being just | ||
would be absurd. Such a man, Religious [[ | would be absurd. Such a man, Religious [[?]] | ||
The second without the first is just as absurd | The second without the first is just as absurd | ||
To be just without being pious is impossible. | To be just without being pious is impossible. | ||
Latest revision as of 15:28, 15 April 2021
2. Notice the necessary relation which these two ideas bear to each other. =One is the antecedent, the other is the consequent. The first without the second, would be unreasoned To undertake to be pious without being just would be absurd. Such a man, Religious ? The second without the first is just as absurd To be just without being pious is impossible. We must be just toward God as well as man. Ills by the Book of Eccl, "Under the sun" is the key. 3. Notice the motive which God uses. "For God shall bring every work into judgment." 4. The recognised difficultly - We are right neither with God nor man. Christ is the remedy - He came from above the Sun to bring us back to God. Hence, ye must be born from above.