.MTMzNQ.MTEyMjA4: Difference between revisions

From Newberry Transcribe
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "W.H. Slack. Sir Your unjust and ungentlemanly letter reached me yesterday, and should have received the silence it merits at my hands, had it not contained some statements,-...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
W.H. Slack. Sir
W.H. Slack. Sir
Your unjust and ungentlemanly letter reached me yesterday, and should have received the silence it merits at my  hands, had it not contained some statements,- which I am forced to correct. First of all; although you sneer at my religious sentiment - which was in bad taste - it is pesrfectly sincere, and will alway prevent me from (wrangling?) any man by trying to step between him and his wife. I have (unclear) in no way. Since the day your wife informed me that you did not wish me to visit her, I have never crossed your threshold, communicated with your wife or daughter (unclear) her. I have always remembered she was your wife - and an old friend who has never done anything to forfeit my respect Understand distinctly, Mr. Slack, I am not in love with your wife, as you infer - and I have never
Your unjust and ungentlemanly letter reached me yesterday, and should have received the silence it merits at my  hands, had it not contained some statements,- which I am forced to correct. First of all; although you sneer at my religious sentiment - which was in bad taste - it is pesrfectly sincere, and will alway prevent me from wronging any man by trying to step between him and his wife. I have wronged you in no way. Since the day your wife informed me that you did not wish me to visit her, I have never crossed your threshold, communicated with your wife or daughter to see her. I have always remembered she was your wife - and an old friend who has never done anything to forfeit my respect Understand distinctly, Mr. Slack, I am not in love with your wife, as you infer - and I have never

Latest revision as of 02:37, 26 November 2020

W.H. Slack. Sir Your unjust and ungentlemanly letter reached me yesterday, and should have received the silence it merits at my hands, had it not contained some statements,- which I am forced to correct. First of all; although you sneer at my religious sentiment - which was in bad taste - it is pesrfectly sincere, and will alway prevent me from wronging any man by trying to step between him and his wife. I have wronged you in no way. Since the day your wife informed me that you did not wish me to visit her, I have never crossed your threshold, communicated with your wife or daughter to see her. I have always remembered she was your wife - and an old friend who has never done anything to forfeit my respect Understand distinctly, Mr. Slack, I am not in love with your wife, as you infer - and I have never